Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bill O'Reilly"
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
I've been to restaurants in Harlem too. They are comparable, and it's no big deal. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:44, 27 September 2007 (EDT) | I've been to restaurants in Harlem too. They are comparable, and it's no big deal. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:44, 27 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Assault== | ||
| + | What? Nothing about billo's assault of an Obama staffer? [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 21:09, 3 February 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 02:09, February 4, 2008
Opinion Show
It's kind of obvious that the O'Reilly factor is an opinion show, so it should stay that way. -- —The preceding unsigned comment was added by PSMax8956 (talk) 10:01, 2 August 2007
- That might be a little to radical for some people here, how about "political commentary show"? Overture 13:02, 2 August 2007 (EDT)
typo
I was just gonna fix the phrase "25 million people a nightly" but can't because it's protected. Sadness, utter sadness. --BillOhannity 21:31, 9 August 2007 (EDT)
same here, was wondering about that. -- —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Veganman (talk) 18:38, 7 September 2007
Harlem restaurant
Although O'Reilly made the restaurant comparison as an example of how silly he had long known anti-black prejudice to be, Media Matters pretended he had been "surprised" to discover just recently that they were comparable. [1] They chose to misinterpret the phrase "couldn't get over the fact that there was no difference" as in indication of surprise rather than taking O'Reilly obvious meaning of, "See? This is what I was saying all along."
I've been to restaurants in Harlem too. They are comparable, and it's no big deal. --Ed Poor Talk 14:44, 27 September 2007 (EDT)
Assault
What? Nothing about billo's assault of an Obama staffer? Barikada 21:09, 3 February 2008 (EST)