Difference between revisions of "Essay:Liberal celebrity obsession"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(References are given.) |
m (wikify) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Media == | == Media == | ||
| − | Liberal celebrity obsession can be observed on most mainstream media outlets. Often the media will prioritize trivial celebrity activities over events with legitimate importance. | + | Liberal celebrity obsession can be observed on most [[mainstream media]] outlets. Often the media will prioritize trivial [[celebrity]] activities over events with legitimate importance. |
'''Some examples include''': | '''Some examples include''': | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
== Entertainment == | == Entertainment == | ||
| − | Publications such as | + | Publications such as [[tabloid]]s and [[Entertainment Tonight]] garner most of their audience from the Liberal population. With this support, these enterprises are allowed to exist because they cater to the liberal appetite. |
== References == | == References == | ||
Revision as of 06:26, January 27, 2008
Liberal celebrity obsession is the phenomenon of obessions over the lives of celebrities which is demonstrated mainly by individuals with liberal political leanings.
Media
Liberal celebrity obsession can be observed on most mainstream media outlets. Often the media will prioritize trivial celebrity activities over events with legitimate importance.
Some examples include:
- Excessive coverage of Paris Hilton's jail sentence.
- Excessive coverage of Anna Nicole Smith and the Liberal media's attempt at making her the next Marilyn Monroe.
- Excessive coverage of Britney Spears' personal life.
Liberals will often rather listen to the testimony of a celebrity such as Sheryl Crow[1] or Leonardo DiCaprio[2] when discussing matters such as Global Warming.
Entertainment
Publications such as tabloids and Entertainment Tonight garner most of their audience from the Liberal population. With this support, these enterprises are allowed to exist because they cater to the liberal appetite.