Difference between revisions of "Atheism and evolution"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
 
December 1997.</ref><ref>[[Jonathan Sarfati]], Ph.D.,F.M., [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3830 ''Refuting Evolution'', Chapter 1, Facts and Bias]</ref> [[Creationism|Creationist]] scientists assert that the [[theory of evolution]] is an inadequate explanation for the variety of life forms on earth.<ref>http://www.icr.org/home/resources/resources_tracts_scientificcaseagainstevolution/</ref>
 
December 1997.</ref><ref>[[Jonathan Sarfati]], Ph.D.,F.M., [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3830 ''Refuting Evolution'', Chapter 1, Facts and Bias]</ref> [[Creationism|Creationist]] scientists assert that the [[theory of evolution]] is an inadequate explanation for the variety of life forms on earth.<ref>http://www.icr.org/home/resources/resources_tracts_scientificcaseagainstevolution/</ref>
  
−
[[Atheism and Debate|Creation scientists tend to win the Creation-Evolution debates]] and many debates have been held since the 1970's particularly in the [[United States]].
+
[[Atheism and Debate|Creation scientists tend to win the Creation-Evolution debates]] and many debates have been held since the 1970's, particularly in the [[United States]].
 
==See Also==
 
==See Also==
 
*[[Atheism]]
 
*[[Atheism]]

Revision as of 00:49, January 18, 2008

In regards to atheism and evolution, a majority of the most prominent and vocal defenders of the evolutionary position which employs methodological naturalism since World War II have been atheists.[1][2] Creationist scientists assert that the theory of evolution is an inadequate explanation for the variety of life forms on earth.[3]

Creation scientists tend to win the Creation-Evolution debates and many debates have been held since the 1970's, particularly in the United States.

See Also

Notes