Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sexual reproduction"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
I don't really see why we need two articles for the same thing. [[User:Sulgran|Sulgran]] 20:53, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
 
I don't really see why we need two articles for the same thing. [[User:Sulgran|Sulgran]] 20:53, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Jargon==
 +
 +
Too much technical jargon? I think the only alternative would be to describe sex in slang terms, which hardly seems appropriate given that this, unlike reality, is a family-friendly place. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 18:57, 16 January 2008 (EST)

Revision as of 23:57, January 16, 2008

"It has been suggested that this article or section be merged with procreation." Alright, I'll bite. Why?--All Fish Welcome 20:43, 18 April 2007 (EDT)

I don't really see why we need two articles for the same thing. Sulgran 20:53, 18 April 2007 (EDT)

Jargon

Too much technical jargon? I think the only alternative would be to describe sex in slang terms, which hardly seems appropriate given that this, unlike reality, is a family-friendly place. Barikada 18:57, 16 January 2008 (EST)