Difference between revisions of "John R. Lott"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by Mark54 (Talk); changed back to last version by Bohdan)
(removed liberal bias, will build further)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
'''John Lott''' (b. 1958) is a scholar who published his research demonstrating that an increase in gun ownership results in a reduction in crime, because guns save more lives through deterrence and self-defense than they kill.{{fact}} The title of his 1999 book, which became a class on the issue of guns, is "More Guns, Less Crime." However, other researchers reanalyzed Lott's data and found numerous errors which nullified Lott's conclusions.<ref>http://islandia.law.yale.edu/ayers/Ayres_Donohue_comment.pdf</ref>
+
'''John Lott''' (b. 1958) is a scholar who published his research demonstrating that an increase in gun ownership results in a reduction in crime, because guns save more lives through deterrence and self-defense than they kill.{{fact}} The title of his 1999 book, which became a class on the issue of guns, is "More Guns, Less Crime."<ref>http://books.google.com/books?id=K6dIvTFsDMkC&dq=John+R+Lott&prev=http://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&channel=s&hl=en&q=%22John+Lott%22&btnG=Google+Search&sa=X&oi=print&ct=result&cd=2&cad=author-navigational</ref>
  
−
Lott also claimed in his book that "98 percent of the time that people use guns defensively, they merely have to brandish a weapon to break off an attack," but was unable to provide data for his assertion, claiming it had been lost in a computer crash.<ref>http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2003/10/we_590_01.html</ref>
+
Lott also observed how large newspapers and major media outlets consistently underreported the defensive use of guns to save lives.  He found that factual accounts of the defensive use of guns would be reported in small rural newspapers but omitted from stories in larger papers, and stories that appeared days or weeks later.<ref>http://johnrlott.blogspot.com/</ref>
  
−
Lott faced additional criticism in 2003, when it was discovered that he had created an alter-ego named "Mary Rosh", which he used to pseudonymously defend his research on various Internet forums.<ref>http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A8884-2003Jan31</ref>
+
Some [[liberals]] have attempted to find flaws in Lott's work.<ref>http://islandia.law.yale.edu/ayers/Ayres_Donohue_comment.pdf</ref>
−
 
 
−
Lott also observed how large newspapers and major media outlets consistently underreported the defensive use of guns to save lives.  He found that factual accounts of the defensive use of guns would be reported in small rural newspapers but omitted from stories in larger papers, and stories that appeared days or weeks later.{{fact}}
 
  
 +
One professor, Michael Bellesiles, wrote a book supportive of the [[gun control]] position that was entitled Arming America, The Origins of a National Gun Culture (2000). Gary Wills praised it in The New York Times, but admitted later that "I was took. The book is a fraud."<ref>Jonah Goldberg, [http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/opinion/columnists/guests/s_501644.html ''Reports of the 2nd Amendment's death have been greatly exaggerated ...''] Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, Apr. 8, 2007.</ref>  Bellesiles resigned from his position as Professor of History at Emory University in Atlanta when an independent committee of scholars examined his work and concluded that "his scholarly integrity is seriously in question."<ref>http://hnn.us/articles/1069.html</ref>
  
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>

Revision as of 16:25, December 15, 2007

John Lott (b. 1958) is a scholar who published his research demonstrating that an increase in gun ownership results in a reduction in crime, because guns save more lives through deterrence and self-defense than they kill.[Citation Needed] The title of his 1999 book, which became a class on the issue of guns, is "More Guns, Less Crime."[1]

Lott also observed how large newspapers and major media outlets consistently underreported the defensive use of guns to save lives. He found that factual accounts of the defensive use of guns would be reported in small rural newspapers but omitted from stories in larger papers, and stories that appeared days or weeks later.[2]

Some liberals have attempted to find flaws in Lott's work.[3]

One professor, Michael Bellesiles, wrote a book supportive of the gun control position that was entitled Arming America, The Origins of a National Gun Culture (2000). Gary Wills praised it in The New York Times, but admitted later that "I was took. The book is a fraud."[4] Bellesiles resigned from his position as Professor of History at Emory University in Atlanta when an independent committee of scholars examined his work and concluded that "his scholarly integrity is seriously in question."[5]

References