Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Golden Compass"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(not anti-religious enough)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
The movie was a disappointment to atheists because it toned down the anti-religious message of the book. See [http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/article/4169/ Frank Furedi] --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 16:44, 10 December 2007 (EST)
 
The movie was a disappointment to atheists because it toned down the anti-religious message of the book. See [http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/article/4169/ Frank Furedi] --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 16:44, 10 December 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
:They don't have to worry.  The director made it clear that he's only doing that with the first movie to get in an young audience, then he's going to unleash the full anti-God diatribe.  I feel sorry for those parents who believe they are allowing their children to watch a regular fun kids film. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 17:47, 10 December 2007 (EST)

Revision as of 22:47, December 10, 2007

The movie was a disappointment to atheists because it toned down the anti-religious message of the book. See Frank Furedi --Ed Poor Talk 16:44, 10 December 2007 (EST)

They don't have to worry. The director made it clear that he's only doing that with the first movie to get in an young audience, then he's going to unleash the full anti-God diatribe. I feel sorry for those parents who believe they are allowing their children to watch a regular fun kids film. Learn together 17:47, 10 December 2007 (EST)