Difference between revisions of "Talk:Private property"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 31: Line 31:
 
require a complete retention of control over disposition. -Sovereignty; as the
 
require a complete retention of control over disposition. -Sovereignty; as the
 
dominion of the seas or over a territory.
 
dominion of the seas or over a territory.
−
- - - Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Ed., p.486
+
- - - Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Ed., p.486
  
 
--[[User:Jetgraphics|Jetgraphics]] 16:43, 19 November 2007 (EST)
 
--[[User:Jetgraphics|Jetgraphics]] 16:43, 19 November 2007 (EST)

Revision as of 21:44, November 19, 2007

I've added a definition section, and a significant section on the purpose of private property. This is my first attempt at creating what is substantially an entire article from whole cloth, and so I expect it can benefit from a great deal of constructive criticism. In particular, I'm working to develop citations, which are skeletal at best, at present. (Most of this is material I learned during the course of my own education in economics and the law--it's pretty fundamental stuff, and so not the kind you'd generally attribute to any particular source.)

I also deleted a couple of sentences that erroneously suggested that private property cannot be held by more than one person. In fact, there are several kinds of joint property recognized in Anglo-American law. I suspect the author meant to distinguish private ownership from, for example, nationalized property, which, in theory, is owned by the public at large, which, of course, is a valid distinction, but the statement as written was inaccurate. User:QBeam 3:45 EST, Nov. 19, 2007

Oops, I just realized that my cut-and-pasting didn't copy in the footnotes. I'm out of time at this minute, but I'll add them shortly...bear with me. User:QBeam 3:50 EST, Nov. 19, 2007


Private property = single owner

The definition for private property and ownership type, in American law, DOES state that only one person can absolutely own private property. Any other interpretation is not supported by the authorities.

If you wish to use another law system, please specify it.

--Jetgraphics 16:20, 19 November 2007 (EST)


Socialist entitlements

According to the Congressional Research Service, all entitlements are "gifts" from Congress. There are no property rights (absolute or qualified) in charity from the public treasury. It would be misleading to state otherwise.

--Jetgraphics 16:34, 19 November 2007 (EST)


Biblical source for absolute ownership

In Genesis 26-28, man is given dominion over the earth, and all that is upon it. In law, dominion means absolute ownership or sovereignty. Since there can be no collective absolute ownership, the only valid conclusion is that individual men are endowed with the birthright to absolutely own themselves, the fruits of their labor, and that which they harmlessly acquire, including land.

DOMINION - Generally accepted definition of "dominion" is perfect control in right of ownership. The word implies both title and possession and appears to require a complete retention of control over disposition. -Sovereignty; as the dominion of the seas or over a territory. - - - Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Ed., p.486

--Jetgraphics 16:43, 19 November 2007 (EST)