Difference between revisions of "Talk:Nobel Prize"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
::Oh sorry. It was the [[User:Aschlafly | Boss]]' edit. I'm chilly already, but, hey, thanks for the advice. [[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 18:05, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 
::Oh sorry. It was the [[User:Aschlafly | Boss]]' edit. I'm chilly already, but, hey, thanks for the advice. [[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 18:05, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:::Awesome! :) --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 18:07, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:::Awesome! :) --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 18:07, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
Actually if you look around you'll find other possible reasons that Damadian at least didn't get the Nobel (I'm not familiar with Hoyle).    See, for example:  [http://whyfiles.org/188nobel_mri/2.html].  It would be more accurate to say that some think it's because of his view of evolution, or something to that effect, since clearly other reasons have been put forth.--[[User:Murray|Murray]] 23:24, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 03:24, March 14, 2007

YO! User:Sid_3050, the sentence, "In two cases, the Nobel Prize was denied to the person most responsible for the discovery apparently..." meaning the discovery of what, exactly? Crackertalk 17:53, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

...why are you asking ME? I didn't add that sentence. Check the edit history. However, the two cases are shown in the following paragraphs. For what it's worth: The article doesn't state what discovery Hoyle should have received a Nobel Prize for, as I pointed out in my edit summary. General advice: Chill out, yo. --Sid 3050 17:59, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
Oh sorry. It was the Boss' edit. I'm chilly already, but, hey, thanks for the advice. Crackertalk 18:05, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
Awesome! :) --Sid 3050 18:07, 13 March 2007 (EDT)


Actually if you look around you'll find other possible reasons that Damadian at least didn't get the Nobel (I'm not familiar with Hoyle). See, for example: [1]. It would be more accurate to say that some think it's because of his view of evolution, or something to that effect, since clearly other reasons have been put forth.--Murray 23:24, 13 March 2007 (EDT)