Difference between revisions of "Just War Theory"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (undeadend)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
'''Just War Theory''' consists of two primary components, first determining if a war may be justly conducted (''jus ad bellum'') and how it must be conducted (''jus in bello'').
+
'''Just War Theory''' consists of two primary components, first determining if a [[war]] may be justly conducted (''jus ad bellum'') and how it must be conducted (''jus in bello'').
  
  

Revision as of 17:48, October 1, 2007

Just War Theory consists of two primary components, first determining if a war may be justly conducted (jus ad bellum) and how it must be conducted (jus in bello).


Jus ad bellum - Is a war just?

Under jus ad bellum, only legitimate authorities can wage war for the right reasons (usually this means a defensive war) and only as a last resort if every other peaceful means to avert war have been used to no avail.

Jus in bello - How must a just war be conducted?

References

See also

External links