Difference between revisions of "Talk:Climate cycles"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (spelling) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:Whoa, thank you, Scientist. It was pretty over the top before. Also a technical note, there is no NPOV policy here, but I think you did the right (heh, punny) thing here. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:24, 26 September 2007 (EDT) | :Whoa, thank you, Scientist. It was pretty over the top before. Also a technical note, there is no NPOV policy here, but I think you did the right (heh, punny) thing here. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:24, 26 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::No problem. I'm going to add a few lines around the middle summarising what AGW theory says; I hope that it doesn't appear too liberal once it's done. | ||
| + | ::I may be a liberal but I know that Conservapedia is, obviously, dominated by conservatives. | ||
| + | ::--[[User:Scientist|Scientist]] 19:31, 26 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 23:31, September 26, 2007
Violates NPOV. I support AGW theory but this is too much. Currently cleaning up. --Scientist 19:02, 26 September 2007 (EDT)
Brief rewrite completed. I'm going to adopt this page and attempt to improve it. I shall begin plotting some graphs of temperature over the past 400,000 years using data from Vostok. --Scientist 19:22, 26 September 2007 (EDT)
- Whoa, thank you, Scientist. It was pretty over the top before. Also a technical note, there is no NPOV policy here, but I think you did the right (heh, punny) thing here. HelpJazz 19:24, 26 September 2007 (EDT)
- No problem. I'm going to add a few lines around the middle summarising what AGW theory says; I hope that it doesn't appear too liberal once it's done.
- I may be a liberal but I know that Conservapedia is, obviously, dominated by conservatives.
- --Scientist 19:31, 26 September 2007 (EDT)