Difference between revisions of "Talk:Age of the Earth"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 5: Line 5:
 
==Helium diffusion, polonium halos, C14 dating==
 
==Helium diffusion, polonium halos, C14 dating==
  
−
All of these methods give ample evidence for a young earth(C14 works best for more recent things). I was wondering if anyone wanted to write about these(If not, I'll do some independent research, but I'm in school right now so I can't promise anything).
+
All of these methods give ample evidence for a young earth(C14 works best for more recent things). I was wondering if anyone wanted to write about these(If not, I can do some independent research for this article, but I'm in school right now so I can't promise anything).
  
 
-- [[User:RichardT|RichardT]]<sup>[[user talk:RichardT|Talk]]</sup> 23:26, 4 September 2007 (EDT)
 
-- [[User:RichardT|RichardT]]<sup>[[user talk:RichardT|Talk]]</sup> 23:26, 4 September 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 03:28, September 5, 2007

The statement that "Charles Lyell supported Hutton's idea in 1830, in Principles of Geology" seems inadequate. Did Lyell set forth a scientific theory about an Old Earth in 1830? I'm skeptical.--Aschlafly 12:38, 18 June 2007 (EDT)

Lyell was a geologist who created several theories related to the geologic age of the earth, including I believe uniformitarianism, and contained in his book Principles of Geology. Karajou 12:50, 18 June 2007 (EDT)
Here's a copy of "Principles of Geology". The table of Contents is in HTML, but the text in PDF. [1] The first few chapters are about the development of ideas of the age of the earth.--Steve 13:45, 18 June 2007 (EDT)

Helium diffusion, polonium halos, C14 dating

All of these methods give ample evidence for a young earth(C14 works best for more recent things). I was wondering if anyone wanted to write about these(If not, I can do some independent research for this article, but I'm in school right now so I can't promise anything).

-- RichardTTalk 23:26, 4 September 2007 (EDT)