Difference between revisions of "Talk:Age of the Earth"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Helium diffusion, polonium halos, C14 dating== | ==Helium diffusion, polonium halos, C14 dating== | ||
| − | All of these methods give ample evidence for a young earth(C14 works best for more recent things). I was wondering if anyone wanted to write about these(If not, I | + | All of these methods give ample evidence for a young earth(C14 works best for more recent things). I was wondering if anyone wanted to write about these(If not, I can do some independent research for this article, but I'm in school right now so I can't promise anything). |
-- [[User:RichardT|RichardT]]<sup>[[user talk:RichardT|Talk]]</sup> 23:26, 4 September 2007 (EDT) | -- [[User:RichardT|RichardT]]<sup>[[user talk:RichardT|Talk]]</sup> 23:26, 4 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 03:28, September 5, 2007
The statement that "Charles Lyell supported Hutton's idea in 1830, in Principles of Geology" seems inadequate. Did Lyell set forth a scientific theory about an Old Earth in 1830? I'm skeptical.--Aschlafly 12:38, 18 June 2007 (EDT)
- Lyell was a geologist who created several theories related to the geologic age of the earth, including I believe uniformitarianism, and contained in his book Principles of Geology. Karajou 12:50, 18 June 2007 (EDT)
Helium diffusion, polonium halos, C14 dating
All of these methods give ample evidence for a young earth(C14 works best for more recent things). I was wondering if anyone wanted to write about these(If not, I can do some independent research for this article, but I'm in school right now so I can't promise anything).