Difference between revisions of "Talk:Larry Craig"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Ending His Term, November)
(who are you to make judgements?)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
It's not only about sex, actually. The real problem with Craig is, I believe, that he keeps lying to the public. I mean, if he's gay he should admit it, simply because there's enough evidence and because he's a public figure, and put an end to this sory. --[[User:Whiteflower|Whiteflower]] 10:10, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
 
It's not only about sex, actually. The real problem with Craig is, I believe, that he keeps lying to the public. I mean, if he's gay he should admit it, simply because there's enough evidence and because he's a public figure, and put an end to this sory. --[[User:Whiteflower|Whiteflower]] 10:10, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
−
 
+
:If he's gay its none of your business. And who are you to make judgements?[[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 12:55, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
−
Can we shorten the bathroom incident? Or should we expand on his "I am not gay" comment?
 
−
 
 
−
He could have meant:
 
−
#I didn't stare through the door or tap with my foot at all. The whole thing is a false report by the cop.
 
−
#I was soliciting male-on-male sex, but my "[[sexual identity]]" is neither [[homosexual]] nor [[bisexual]].
 
−
 
 
−
Many men who have sex with other men make a big deal out of denying their [[homosexuality]]. This seems to be based on a sharp distinction between [[homosexual behavior]], i.e., two males being sexual together, and [[homosexual identity]]. I'm not sure why this matters. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:33, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== Ending His Term, November ==
 
−
 
 
−
Is that phrase accurate? Reason I ask is that it was added by someone later blocked for "silliness". [[User:ATang|ATang]] 12:44, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
 

Revision as of 16:55, August 31, 2007

What a deceitful person. -Wwwknow 21:40, 29 August 2007 (EDT)

What are you suggesting, that he be impeached? Rob Smith 21:50, 29 August 2007 (EDT)

No. The Constitution limits impeachment only for treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors. And let's be practical: Craig would resign before he's impeached.-Wwwknow 20:37, 30 August 2007 (EDT)

But's only about sex, and there seems to rampant and rabid anti-gay sentiment behind much of this criticism. Rob Smith 20:43, 30 August 2007 (EDT)

It's not only about sex, actually. The real problem with Craig is, I believe, that he keeps lying to the public. I mean, if he's gay he should admit it, simply because there's enough evidence and because he's a public figure, and put an end to this sory. --Whiteflower 10:10, 31 August 2007 (EDT)

If he's gay its none of your business. And who are you to make judgements?Rob Smith 12:55, 31 August 2007 (EDT)
Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Larry_Craig&oldid=283096"