Difference between revisions of "Template:Examples of Liberal Bias"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Examples of liberal bias: updated heading)
(Added {{fact}} tag to uncited points, which without empirical examples or warrants are simply unsubstantiated claims. Deleted point 25 because I think it is a misunderstanding. Feel free to correct me)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
#calling conservative free speech "hate" speech <ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia_talk:Deletion_Policy&rcid=279869 Before the article was deleted, it said "New page: American Taliban You site is nothing but a Democratic hate site".</ref>
 
#calling conservative free speech "hate" speech <ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia_talk:Deletion_Policy&rcid=279869 Before the article was deleted, it said "New page: American Taliban You site is nothing but a Democratic hate site".</ref>
−
#pretending to know more than he does; [[Isaac Newton]] admitted that he knew almost nothing, yet a [[liberal]] rarely admits that and often pretends to know more than he does
+
#pretending to know more than he does; [[Isaac Newton]] admitted that he knew almost nothing, yet a [[liberal]] rarely admits that and often pretends to know more than he does {{fact}}
 
#resistance to quantifying things, such as [[liberal bias]] or [[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness|openmindedness]]
 
#resistance to quantifying things, such as [[liberal bias]] or [[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness|openmindedness]]
 
#preference for obscenity and profanity  <ref> [http://newsbusters.org/node/11171 When It Comes to Profanity, the Left Can't Help Itself] by [[Matthew Sheffield]] at [[NewsBusters]] </ref>
 
#preference for obscenity and profanity  <ref> [http://newsbusters.org/node/11171 When It Comes to Profanity, the Left Can't Help Itself] by [[Matthew Sheffield]] at [[NewsBusters]] </ref>
−
#insistence on having the last word in a discussion or debate
+
#insistence on having the last word in a discussion or debate {{fact}}
−
#over-reliance on mockery
+
#over-reliance on mockery {{fact}
−
#over-reliance on accusations of hypocrisy
+
#over-reliance on accusations of hypocrisy {{fact}}
−
#hostility to [[faith]]
+
#hostility to [[faith]] {{fact}}
−
#insistence on censoring certain speech, such as a description of [[The Flood]] or even teaching children about a massive flood, despite its acceptance by a majority of Americans
+
#insistence on censoring certain speech, such as a description of [[The Flood]] or even teaching children about a massive flood, despite its acceptance by a majority of Americans {{fact}}
−
#believing that the education of children is for [[liberals]] to control
+
#believing that the education of children is for [[liberals]] to control {{fact}}
 
#believing that [[conservatives]] will fail, and refusing to accept when they succeed, as when [[George W. Bush]] won in 2000
 
#believing that [[conservatives]] will fail, and refusing to accept when they succeed, as when [[George W. Bush]] won in 2000
−
#reluctance to admit that anything is morally wrong
+
#reluctance to admit that anything is morally wrong {{fact}}
−
#bullying conservatives who disagree with [[liberal]] views
+
#bullying conservatives who disagree with [[liberal]] views {{fact}}
−
#draw an analogy between opponents and racists, no matter how illogical
+
#draw an analogy between opponents and racists, no matter how illogical {{fact}}
−
#claim that science supports their position, and ignore any evidence that shows their position to be false
+
#claim that science supports their position, and ignore any evidence that shows their position to be false {{fact}}
 
#often declare that an adversary should be "ashamed of himself," while never saying that about a fellow [[liberal]] (such as [[Ted Kennedy]] or [[Bill Clinton]])
 
#often declare that an adversary should be "ashamed of himself," while never saying that about a fellow [[liberal]] (such as [[Ted Kennedy]] or [[Bill Clinton]])
 
#willing to give away everything held dear by the majority to avoid serious conflict (such as the [[appeasement]] of Prime Minister [[Neville Chamberlain]], or those [[liberal]]s who wish to pull our troops out of Iraq, and embolden the [[terrorist]]s).
 
#willing to give away everything held dear by the majority to avoid serious conflict (such as the [[appeasement]] of Prime Minister [[Neville Chamberlain]], or those [[liberal]]s who wish to pull our troops out of Iraq, and embolden the [[terrorist]]s).
−
#using [[hyperbole]] instead of fact-based logic in an attempt to tug at people's emotions rather than appealing to their sense of reason.
+
#using [[hyperbole]] instead of fact-based logic in an attempt to tug at people's emotions rather than appealing to their sense of reason. {{fact}}
−
#often long-winded and verbose, and in debates [[liberals]] often consume more than their fair share of the alloted time, leaving less time for the other side.
+
#often long-winded and verbose, and in debates [[liberals]] often consume more than their fair share of the alloted time, leaving less time for the other side. {{fact}}
−
#attempting to control the rules of evidence used in a debate. For example, claiming that [[Young Earth Creationism]] is false, and then refusing to allow supporting evidence by claiming that the scientists are religiously motivated.
+
#attempting to control the rules of evidence used in a debate. For example, claiming that [[Young Earth Creationism]] is false, and then refusing to allow supporting evidence by claiming that the scientists are religiously motivated. {{fact}}
 
#attempting to control the definitions of words through [[political correctness]].  For example, referring to [[Israel]] as "occupied territories" or suggesting that Al-Qaeda terrorists in Iraq are not part of Al-Qaeda.
 
#attempting to control the definitions of words through [[political correctness]].  For example, referring to [[Israel]] as "occupied territories" or suggesting that Al-Qaeda terrorists in Iraq are not part of Al-Qaeda.
 
#Dismissing legitimate criticism as "a joke" <ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Liberal_Style&oldid=266960]</ref>
 
#Dismissing legitimate criticism as "a joke" <ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Liberal_Style&oldid=266960]</ref>
−
#Denying something widely known to be true but difficult to prove, such as observing that men are far more likely to work in gas stations than women.
+
#Denying something widely known to be true but difficult to prove, such as observing that men are far more likely to work in gas stations than women. {{fact}}
 
#Will often deny being a liberal, or will claim to be a "true conservative", while spouting liberal and democratic talking points and criticizing basic conservative beliefs and principles.
 
#Will often deny being a liberal, or will claim to be a "true conservative", while spouting liberal and democratic talking points and criticizing basic conservative beliefs and principles.
−
#using non sequiturs in argument, such as responding to the point above that [[liberals]] over-rely on accusations of hypocrisy by citing an example of conservatives' observing [[liberal hypocrisy]].  But their example does not help their argument.  Quite the contrary, use of that example tends to prove that [[liberals]] do over-rely on accusations of hypocrisy (relativism).  Think about that.
+
 
  
 
==References==
 
==References==

Revision as of 18:32, August 30, 2007

Examples of liberal style

The style of a liberal often includes these characteristics:

  1. calling conservative free speech "hate" speech [1]
  2. pretending to know more than he does; Isaac Newton admitted that he knew almost nothing, yet a liberal rarely admits that and often pretends to know more than he does[Citation Needed]
  3. resistance to quantifying things, such as liberal bias or openmindedness
  4. preference for obscenity and profanity [2]
  5. insistence on having the last word in a discussion or debate[Citation Needed]
  6. over-reliance on mockery {{fact}
  7. over-reliance on accusations of hypocrisy[Citation Needed]
  8. hostility to faith[Citation Needed]
  9. insistence on censoring certain speech, such as a description of The Flood or even teaching children about a massive flood, despite its acceptance by a majority of Americans[Citation Needed]
  10. believing that the education of children is for liberals to control[Citation Needed]
  11. believing that conservatives will fail, and refusing to accept when they succeed, as when George W. Bush won in 2000
  12. reluctance to admit that anything is morally wrong[Citation Needed]
  13. bullying conservatives who disagree with liberal views[Citation Needed]
  14. draw an analogy between opponents and racists, no matter how illogical[Citation Needed]
  15. claim that science supports their position, and ignore any evidence that shows their position to be false[Citation Needed]
  16. often declare that an adversary should be "ashamed of himself," while never saying that about a fellow liberal (such as Ted Kennedy or Bill Clinton)
  17. willing to give away everything held dear by the majority to avoid serious conflict (such as the appeasement of Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, or those liberals who wish to pull our troops out of Iraq, and embolden the terrorists).
  18. using hyperbole instead of fact-based logic in an attempt to tug at people's emotions rather than appealing to their sense of reason.[Citation Needed]
  19. often long-winded and verbose, and in debates liberals often consume more than their fair share of the alloted time, leaving less time for the other side.[Citation Needed]
  20. attempting to control the rules of evidence used in a debate. For example, claiming that Young Earth Creationism is false, and then refusing to allow supporting evidence by claiming that the scientists are religiously motivated.[Citation Needed]
  21. attempting to control the definitions of words through political correctness. For example, referring to Israel as "occupied territories" or suggesting that Al-Qaeda terrorists in Iraq are not part of Al-Qaeda.
  22. Dismissing legitimate criticism as "a joke" [3]
  23. Denying something widely known to be true but difficult to prove, such as observing that men are far more likely to work in gas stations than women.[Citation Needed]
  24. Will often deny being a liberal, or will claim to be a "true conservative", while spouting liberal and democratic talking points and criticizing basic conservative beliefs and principles.


References