Difference between revisions of "Frothingham v. Mellon"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: In ''Frothingham v. Mellon'', 262 U.S. 447 (1923), this Court held that Article III and the separation of powers generally standing to sue based merely on plaintiff's status as...) |
Aziraphale (talk | contribs) (v) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In ''Frothingham v. Mellon'', 262 U.S. 447 (1923), this Court held that [[Article III]] and the [[separation of powers]] generally [[standing]] to sue based merely on plaintiff's status as a taxpayer. An narrow and [[liberal]] exception to this rule was established in ''[[Flast v. Cohen]]'', 392 U.S. 83 (1968), for [[Establishment Clause]] cases. | In ''Frothingham v. Mellon'', 262 U.S. 447 (1923), this Court held that [[Article III]] and the [[separation of powers]] generally [[standing]] to sue based merely on plaintiff's status as a taxpayer. An narrow and [[liberal]] exception to this rule was established in ''[[Flast v. Cohen]]'', 392 U.S. 83 (1968), for [[Establishment Clause]] cases. | ||
| − | [[category: | + | [[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] |
Revision as of 17:00, August 23, 2007
In Frothingham v. Mellon, 262 U.S. 447 (1923), this Court held that Article III and the separation of powers generally standing to sue based merely on plaintiff's status as a taxpayer. An narrow and liberal exception to this rule was established in Flast v. Cohen, 392 U.S. 83 (1968), for Establishment Clause cases.