Difference between revisions of "Talk:Precambrian"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Name)
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
It appears from some searching that "Precambrian" (one word) is the normal version of the name.  Any objections to renaming the article that?  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:35, 9 August 2007 (EDT)
 
It appears from some searching that "Precambrian" (one word) is the normal version of the name.  Any objections to renaming the article that?  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:35, 9 August 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Nope. Please create a redirect page from "Pre-Cambrian" to "Precambrian" though, as both are potential searches for the topic. '''[[User:Stryker|ΨtrykeЯ]]'''<sup><small>[[User_Talk:Stryker| eh?>]]</small></sup> 11:38, 9 August 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 15:38, August 9, 2007

Having references is nice and all but 14 for a single paragraph strikes me as a bit excessive. --Sulgran 04:36, 21 April 2007 (EDT)

There are multiple disciplines covered. Conservative 05:36, 21 April 2007 (EDT)conservative

Name

It appears from some searching that "Precambrian" (one word) is the normal version of the name. Any objections to renaming the article that? Philip J. Rayment 11:35, 9 August 2007 (EDT)

Nope. Please create a redirect page from "Pre-Cambrian" to "Precambrian" though, as both are potential searches for the topic. ΨtrykeЯ eh?> 11:38, 9 August 2007 (EDT)