Difference between revisions of "Sexual ethics"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
(To argue otherwise is to argue against the entire weight of Scripture on matters of sexual ethics.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Bill Bennett wrote:
 
Bill Bennett wrote:
−
:The entire Bible clearly teaches ... that sexual intercourse should take place in the context of the [[marital union]] of male and female. To argue otherwise is to argue against the entire weight of Scripture on matters of sexual ethics. <ref>''The Broken Hearth'', Page 191 </ref>
+
:The entire Bible clearly teaches ... that sexual intercourse should take place in the context of the [[marital union]] of male and female. To argue otherwise is to argue against the entire weight of Scripture on matters of [[sexual ethics]]. <ref>''The Broken Hearth'', Page 191 </ref>

Revision as of 08:58, August 8, 2007

Bill Bennett wrote:

The entire Bible clearly teaches ... that sexual intercourse should take place in the context of the marital union of male and female. To argue otherwise is to argue against the entire weight of Scripture on matters of sexual ethics. [1]
  1. ↑ The Broken Hearth, Page 191