Difference between revisions of "Income Redistribution"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by Baby905 (Talk); changed back to last version by Ungtss)
(edit)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
'''Income redistribution''' is the act or government policy of transferring [[wealth]] from richer individuals to poorer individuals.  It takes two forms: ''voluntary income redistribution'' (otherwise known as [[charity]]), and ''compulsary income redistribution''.
+
'''Income redistribution''' is the act or government policy of transferring [[wealth]] from richer individuals to poorer individuals.  It takes two forms: ''voluntary redistribution'' (otherwise known as [[charity]]), and ''compulsary redistribution''.
  
−
Some [[conservative]]s (such as [[Ayn Rand]]) oppose all forms of income redistribution, believing that a person should only receive in income what they are able to earn through the markets.  They believe that [[charity]] does harm both to the giver (by depriving him of what he earned), to the receiver (by not encouraging him to ''earn'' money), and to society as a whole (by taking money away from those who have shown themselves able to use it effectively, and giving it to those who have shown themselves incapable of using it effectively.
+
Some [[conservative]]s (such as [[Ayn Rand]]) oppose most forms of redistribution, believing that a person should only receive in income what they are able to earn through the markets.  They believe that [[charity]] does harm both to the giver (by depriving him of what he earned), to the receiver (by not encouraging him to ''earn'' his sustenance), and to society as a whole (by taking resources away from those who have shown themselves able to create employment for others, and giving it to [[prodigal]]s.
  
−
Other conservatives favor ''voluntary'' income redistribution through charities, but oppose ''compulsary'' income redistribution, which they see as an unjust interference with private property rights.
+
Other conservatives favor ''voluntary'' redistribution through charities, but oppose ''compulsary'' redistribution, which they see as an unjust interference with private property rights.
  
−
[[Liberal]]s generally support both forms of income redistribution.  Their position is premised on the [[egalitarian]] and/or [[Marxist]] view of [[economic justice]], that it is unjust for individuals to have grossly different incomes.  Because market systems naturally create these inequalities, and because of their belief that charity cannot adequately counter these inequalities, liberals believe that some degree of compulsary income redistribution is necessary in a just society.
+
[[Liberal]]s generally support both forms of income redistribution.  Their position is premised on an [[egalitarian]] view of [[economic justice]], that it is unjust for individuals to have grossly different access to economic resources.  Because market systems can at times create these inequalities, and because of their belief that individual charitable giving cannot be relied upon to counter these inequalities, liberals tend to advocate some degree of compulsary redistribution of resources as necessary.  
  
 
Examples of government programs performing compulsary income redistribution include [[welfare]] and [[progressive taxation]].
 
Examples of government programs performing compulsary income redistribution include [[welfare]] and [[progressive taxation]].
  
 
[[Category:Economics]]
 
[[Category:Economics]]

Revision as of 16:59, July 17, 2007

Income redistribution is the act or government policy of transferring wealth from richer individuals to poorer individuals. It takes two forms: voluntary redistribution (otherwise known as charity), and compulsary redistribution.

Some conservatives (such as Ayn Rand) oppose most forms of redistribution, believing that a person should only receive in income what they are able to earn through the markets. They believe that charity does harm both to the giver (by depriving him of what he earned), to the receiver (by not encouraging him to earn his sustenance), and to society as a whole (by taking resources away from those who have shown themselves able to create employment for others, and giving it to prodigals.

Other conservatives favor voluntary redistribution through charities, but oppose compulsary redistribution, which they see as an unjust interference with private property rights.

Liberals generally support both forms of income redistribution. Their position is premised on an egalitarian view of economic justice, that it is unjust for individuals to have grossly different access to economic resources. Because market systems can at times create these inequalities, and because of their belief that individual charitable giving cannot be relied upon to counter these inequalities, liberals tend to advocate some degree of compulsary redistribution of resources as necessary.

Examples of government programs performing compulsary income redistribution include welfare and progressive taxation.