Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sam Brownback"
MountainDew (Talk | contribs) |
Bob Arctor (Talk | contribs) (Blogs 4 Brownback a parody?) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:::All sources are biased, just some more so than others. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 17:32, 26 March 2007 (EDT) | :::All sources are biased, just some more so than others. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 17:32, 26 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Blogs 4 Brownback was removed from the list of blogs because it's supposedly a "parody." What is the proof of this? It looks legit to me. I don't think arbitrarily removing it was the right thing to do. I'm adding it back and would appreciate a discussion before such actions are taken. --[[User:Bob Arctor|Bob Arctor]] 01:15, 10 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 05:15, July 10, 2007
HarryPalms
I suspect that HarryPalms [contribs] is a vandal. The name is an obvious reference to "hairy palms". Disgusting. Here's what he inserted into this article:
- He cites former Senator Jesse Helms as a model.[1]
I vote to remove this as it is a link to an unreliable and obviously biased source. Actually I'm not even going to wait for a vote. This assertion isn't even cited in the article. Wikipedia also makes such an unsupported assertion. This is an obvious (though subtle) attempt to smear a wonderful principled conservative. -- Bob Arctor 16:24, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
- All sources are biased, just some more so than others. MountainDew 17:32, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
Blogs 4 Brownback was removed from the list of blogs because it's supposedly a "parody." What is the proof of this? It looks legit to me. I don't think arbitrarily removing it was the right thing to do. I'm adding it back and would appreciate a discussion before such actions are taken. --Bob Arctor 01:15, 10 July 2007 (EDT)
