Difference between revisions of "Talk:World naval powers"
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
==I removed some of the [[liberal claptrap]] producing a false sense of security== | ==I removed some of the [[liberal claptrap]] producing a false sense of security== | ||
[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 16:37, May 30, 2025 (EDT) | [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 16:37, May 30, 2025 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Andy, What's wrong with the [[Financial Times]] as a source?== | ||
| + | [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=World_naval_powers&curid=179518&diff=2137410&oldid=2136031] it is after all a newspaper of record by a major [[NATO]] power the [[United States]] is pledged to defend. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Is this [[censorship]]? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky Must Go!'']]</sup> 16:14, June 29, 2025 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:14, June 29, 2025
The list of "most powerful" is in error; Japan's navy is bigger than the Russian Federation. RobSGive Peace a Chance! 11:26, September 30, 2023 (EDT)
How is "most powerful" measured? By size of fleet or nuclear capability? RobSGive Peace a Chance! 11:27, September 30, 2023 (EDT)
- Feel free to create your own World naval powers article. Our attempt at cooperative editing didn't work out. So I moved on. Conservative (talk) 11:40, September 30, 2023 (EDT)
- Cooperative editing begins with discussion. I have nothing further to say on this matter. RobSGive Peace a Chance! 11:41, September 30, 2023 (EDT)
See: [[Essay: The U.S. Navy is the most powerful navy in the world]].
I hope this essay helps clarifies matters. Conservative (talk) 22:10, October 2, 2023 (EDT)
- If anyone has any issues with this essay, I suggest creating the essays Essay: The U.S. Navy is NOT the most powerful navy in the world and Essay: China's navy is the most powerful navy in the world. Conservative (talk) 22:27, October 2, 2023 (EDT)
- Why China's Navy is a JOKE by Colonel Douglas Macgregor
- Key point: Colonel Douglas Macgregor is one of RobSmith's biggest heros. RobSmith wanted to see Douglas Macgregor be Conservapedia's conservative of the year in 2022. Et tu, Colonel Douglas Macgregor? Conservative (talk) 23:07, October 2, 2023 (EDT)
- How about this: Essay:Comparing apples and oranges: China v. the US. RobSGive Peace a Chance! 01:03, October 3, 2023 (EDT)
PLA
The PLA is not under command of the government of China, the State Council. The government of China has no military. The PLA and the PLA Navy belongs to a political party, the CCP. RobSGive Peace a Chance! 02:52, October 3, 2023 (EDT)
Rule Britannia, Britannia Rule the Waves
How the mighty have fallen. UK ranks 9th, behind France (of all people)? This should tell you something (about America's future), or else the source just stinks. RobSGive Peace a Chance! 03:07, October 3, 2023 (EDT)
Colonel Douglas MacGregor said about China in the video Why China's Navy is a JOKE: "China has huge problems just holding itself together. So I think we should set China aside and understand that."Why China's Navy is a JOKE See: [[Essay:Skepticism about China remaining a global power|Skepticism about China remaining a global power]]So I think we should set China aside and understand that."[1] See: [[Essay:Skepticism about China remaining a global power|Skepticism about China remaining a global power]]
I doubt that a China that "has huge problems just holding itself together" will be able to afford such a thing - especially long term. Conservative (talk) 11:05, October 3, 2023 (EDT)
- Yah, well Doug Macgregor also said Trump's Irrelevant & No Longer in Control, so I think we stick your ability to judge the credibility of sources in the trash. RobSZelensky Must Go! 16:40, May 30, 2025 (EDT)
I removed some of the liberal claptrap producing a false sense of security
RobSZelensky Must Go! 16:37, May 30, 2025 (EDT)
Andy, What's wrong with the Financial Times as a source?
[2] it is after all a newspaper of record by a major NATO power the United States is pledged to defend.
Is this censorship? RobSZelensky Must Go! 16:14, June 29, 2025 (EDT)