Difference between revisions of "Talk:Capitalism"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Guitarplayer (talk | contribs) (Image) |
Hojimachong (talk | contribs) (→Image) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
HEE HEE! [[User:Guitarplayer|Guitarplayer]] 17:11, 25 June 2007 (EDT) | HEE HEE! [[User:Guitarplayer|Guitarplayer]] 17:11, 25 June 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | :The image is to demonstrate the absurdity of image choice at [[Socialism]]. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğ''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 17:12, 25 June 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:12, June 25, 2007
"Anti Semitic"? You _are_ aware that Karl Marx was Jewish, right? --BobD 18:09, 14 April 2007 (EDT)
- He was ethnically Jewish yes. However, his parents were converts to Christianity. He was not raised Jewish and wrote many anti-semitic essays. He was a self-hating Jew! Google it. -- CoulterMan 18:14, 14 April 2007 (EDT)
Cut:
- an economic system where the means of production are privately owned and operated
It's still capitalism, even if the government runs some businesses. There is no bright line of division between free market capitalism and a totally planned economy. Even under the Soviet Union, there was a thriving black market. Maybe we need an economic spectrum to describe the gradations of control. --Ed Poor 05:21, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
- I endores this view and beleive Marxist rhetoric needs to be kept out of this article. Capitalism is not an ideology, unlike Marxism, and there is no comparison between the two on that basis. RobS 13:07, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
- I'd argue it is, but its tenets are rarely articulated. Anyone want to take a crack at it? (The big one seems to be that ANYTHING a corporation does to make money is inherently good.)
- Don't bother. Gorby tried to salvage what he could, and still is a convinced Communst, but the rest of the planet has rejected the flawed notion that Communism is a completing "ideology" to Captialism. Please, abandon this moot point. RobS 13:37, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
- I'd argue it is, but its tenets are rarely articulated. Anyone want to take a crack at it? (The big one seems to be that ANYTHING a corporation does to make money is inherently good.)
- "It's still capitalism, even if the government runs some businesses." No it isn't!
"There is no bright line of division between free market capitalism and a totally planned economy." Yes, there is! -- AmeriCan 22:32, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
Image
HEE HEE! Guitarplayer 17:11, 25 June 2007 (EDT)
- The image is to demonstrate the absurdity of image choice at Socialism. --Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğtalk 17:12, 25 June 2007 (EDT)