Difference between revisions of "Atheism"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
−
Atheism, in common usage, means "of a superior intelligence".  In practice, Atheists discounts supernatural phenomena such as the afterlife, divine revelation, ghosts as well as God.
+
Atheism is disbelief in, or denial of, the existence of a god or gods.
  
−
Atheism is popularly divided into Strong and Weak Atheism:  Strong Atheism can be defined as a dogma in itself: The assertion that there absolutely is no God, despite the fact that the existence of the supernatural cannot be disproven. Some people calling themselves Atheists acknowledge that God can not be disproven, and while this does not suggest that there *is* a god (no more than the fact that we cannot disprove leprechauns suggests that they exist) it would nonetheless be unscientific to declare a God or godlike being impossible. These people are actually Agnostics.
 
  
−
Atheism is closely tied with Secular Humanism. Popularly-known Atheists and Secular Humanists include Stephen Hawking, Albert Einstein, Stephen J. Gould, Carl Sagan, Richard Dawkins and [[Sam Harris]].  It is also worth noting that two of the biggest mass murderers in history, Pol Pot and Stalin, were atheists.
+
== Origins ==
  
−
== Atheist morality ==
+
It is difficult to trace the origins of atheism as a result of the incomplete historic record.  It is known that ancient Greece produced a theory of materialism as early as the 5th century BC.  The materialist world view was essentially mathematical and had no room for gods.
  
−
Many atheists base their moral code upon emotion, experience and empirically derived ethics, such as those promoted by secular humanism. Atheists hold that the Bible cannot be our source of morality as it contains countless calls for immoral behavior such as the Israelites driving out heathen nations from Canaan, stoning homosexuals and adulterers to death, and the institution of slavery.
 
  
−
Atheists often subscribe to the secular humanist idea that it is far more ethical to do what is right simply because you feel that it's right, rather than because you fear divine punishment.
+
The materialist Epicurus (341-270 BC) pointed out the difficulty created by evil:
  
−
The common argument that Nazism and Stalinism were atheistic in nature and that their violence stemmed from that nature ignores more recent examples of what they actually were; Personality cults. Hitler, Stalin, Lenin, and more recently despots like Kim Jong Il and Fidel Castro were or are at the center of governments which enforce reverence unto them as though they were deities.
 
  
−
==References==
+
:Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
−
<references/>
+
:Is he able, but not willing? then he is malevolent.
 +
:Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
 +
:Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?
 +
 
 +
 
 +
== Atheism and morality ==
 +
 
 +
The atheist rejection of a god or gods and consequent rejection of religiously based moral codes creates a logical problem for atheists wishing to assert a moral code of their own.  Without divine approval for one moral code over all others it becomes logically difficult to argue that one code is superior to all others.  One form of response is illustrated in the following quote from [[Albert Einstein]]:
 +
 
 +
 
 +
:“A man’s ethical behaviour should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary.  Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death”.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
== Atheism and Agnosticism ==
 +
 
 +
Atheism and agnosticism are logically distinct concepts.  Whilst atheist reject the existence of a god or gods, agnostics do not do so.  [[Richard Dawkins]] has contrasted the two positions as follows:
 +
 
 +
 
 +
:“There may be fairies at the bottom of the garden.  There is no evidence for it, but you can’t prove that there aren’t any, so shouldn’t we be agnostic with respect to fairies?”.

Revision as of 02:48, March 8, 2007

Atheism is disbelief in, or denial of, the existence of a god or gods.


Origins

It is difficult to trace the origins of atheism as a result of the incomplete historic record. It is known that ancient Greece produced a theory of materialism as early as the 5th century BC. The materialist world view was essentially mathematical and had no room for gods.


The materialist Epicurus (341-270 BC) pointed out the difficulty created by evil:


Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing? then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?


Atheism and morality

The atheist rejection of a god or gods and consequent rejection of religiously based moral codes creates a logical problem for atheists wishing to assert a moral code of their own. Without divine approval for one moral code over all others it becomes logically difficult to argue that one code is superior to all others. One form of response is illustrated in the following quote from Albert Einstein:


“A man’s ethical behaviour should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death”.


Atheism and Agnosticism

Atheism and agnosticism are logically distinct concepts. Whilst atheist reject the existence of a god or gods, agnostics do not do so. Richard Dawkins has contrasted the two positions as follows:


“There may be fairies at the bottom of the garden. There is no evidence for it, but you can’t prove that there aren’t any, so shouldn’t we be agnostic with respect to fairies?”.
Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Atheism&oldid=20299"