Difference between revisions of "Talk:Oath Keepers"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Mr. Smith: Words cannot express how I feel about you improving my edits with unreferenced assertions and bogus factoids. Press on my good man!--[[User:LSimons|LSimons]] ([[User talk:LSimons|talk]]) 14:18, April 20, 2023 (EDT) | Mr. Smith: Words cannot express how I feel about you improving my edits with unreferenced assertions and bogus factoids. Press on my good man!--[[User:LSimons|LSimons]] ([[User talk:LSimons|talk]]) 14:18, April 20, 2023 (EDT) | ||
:Hey, you're the one who chose to use NPR. I'm sure there were other more credible sources that could have been used. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 14:44, April 20, 2023 (EDT) | :Hey, you're the one who chose to use NPR. I'm sure there were other more credible sources that could have been used. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a chance'']]</sup> 14:44, April 20, 2023 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::Not sure how I can respond to you. It's like you're saying almost all other news sources would have a different take from NPR?--[[User:LSimons|LSimons]] ([[User talk:LSimons|talk]]) 15:19, April 20, 2023 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:19, April 20, 2023
Copywrite Details box must be included since this information was copied from the DOJ. --LSimons (talk) 17:22, January 14, 2022 (EST)
The Independent Sentinel reference does not contain anything that verifies the factoid concerning a ‘politically weaponized Biden DOJ’. I know you can do better. --LSimons (talk) 15:42, January 15, 2022 (EST)
- The Tucker Carlson interview with Caldwell was pretty good, and it's contained within the text article. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 17:25, January 15, 2022 (EST)
- We may have to clean up the DOJ press release sooner or later; DOJ has pretty pee-poor credibility on anything these days. They did it to themselves. RobSLet's Go Brandon! 17:27, January 15, 2022 (EST)
Mr. Smith: Words cannot express how I feel about you improving my edits with unreferenced assertions and bogus factoids. Press on my good man!--LSimons (talk) 14:18, April 20, 2023 (EDT)
- Hey, you're the one who chose to use NPR. I'm sure there were other more credible sources that could have been used. RobSGive Peace a chance 14:44, April 20, 2023 (EDT)