Difference between revisions of "Talk:Corruption"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by DanielPulido (Talk) to last version by RJJensen)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Corruption doesn't belong under politics?  I always thought corruption and politics went together like chicken and waffles. --[[User:Gulik5|Gulik5]] 01:04, 3 April 2008 (EDT)
 
Corruption doesn't belong under politics?  I always thought corruption and politics went together like chicken and waffles. --[[User:Gulik5|Gulik5]] 01:04, 3 April 2008 (EDT)
  
−
:Rod, if you overstate the case for liberals being corrupt, I will move this article to [[Liberal corruption]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 09:37, 18 December 2008 (EST)
+
I want to have sex with underage horses [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 16:52, 18 January 2010 (EST)
−
::Corruption appears as soon as politicians get power--it's pretty much a fact of life in every country, in every party, in every political era. What's interesting is how it's fought against. Here's where [[republicanism]] enters as a weapon to fight corruption.[[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 16:52, 18 January 2010 (EST)
 

Revision as of 05:39, September 28, 2022

Corruption doesn't belong under politics? I always thought corruption and politics went together like chicken and waffles. --Gulik5 01:04, 3 April 2008 (EDT)

I want to have sex with underage horses RJJensen 16:52, 18 January 2010 (EST)