Difference between revisions of "James Eads"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(improved) |
m |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*first in the [[U.S.]] to use pneumatic caissons in constructing piers, sunk to a record-breaking depth of 123 feet | *first in the [[U.S.]] to use pneumatic caissons in constructing piers, sunk to a record-breaking depth of 123 feet | ||
| − | Construction began in 1867 and it was dedicated on July 4, 1874.<ref>https://www.stlouis-mo.gov/government/departments/planning/cultural-resources/city-landmarks/Eads-Bridge.cfm</ref>His project was not commercially successful at the time. | + | Construction began in 1867 and it was dedicated on July 4, 1874.<ref>https://www.stlouis-mo.gov/government/departments/planning/cultural-resources/city-landmarks/Eads-Bridge.cfm</ref> His project was not commercially successful at the time. |
== References == | == References == | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
[[category:engineering]] | [[category:engineering]] | ||
Latest revision as of 02:22, July 31, 2022
James Buchanan Eads (1820-1887) was a self-taught civil engineer who first made a fortune salvaging material from wreckage at the bottom of the Mississippi River, and then built for $10 million the Eads Bridge that was the largest of its time after the Civil War.
Eads was an innovative, but demanding, engineer who had the audacity to return a massive amount of steel to Andrew Carnegie's company because its quality was not high enough for Eads. His bridge was such a marvel of engineer that it continues to carry trains, cars, and pedestrians across the river to this day.
This bridge accomplished many "firsts":
- first steel-truss bridge
- first bridge to carry railroad tracks
- first major bridge over the Mississippi River
- first to rely entirely on cantilever construction for its superstructure
- first to use tubular cord members
- first in the U.S. to use pneumatic caissons in constructing piers, sunk to a record-breaking depth of 123 feet
Construction began in 1867 and it was dedicated on July 4, 1874.[1] His project was not commercially successful at the time.