Difference between revisions of "Censorship of conversion therapy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(As of May 2022, an estimated 19 states and dozens of cities impose some restrictions on conversion therapy, while Minnesota failed to enact legislation pushed in promotion of the homosexual agenda there.) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Censorship of conversion therapy''' has been attempted by [[liberal]]s for more than a decade, and is contrary to reason and [[freedom of speech]].<ref>https://reason.com/2016/01/29/conversion-therapy-is-bad-but-banning-it/</ref> In ''Otto v. City of Boca Raton'', the | + | '''Censorship of conversion therapy''' has been attempted by [[liberal]]s for more than a decade, and is contrary to reason and [[freedom of speech]].<ref>https://reason.com/2016/01/29/conversion-therapy-is-bad-but-banning-it/</ref> In ''Otto v. City of Boca Raton'', the U.S. Court of Appeals for the [[Eleventh Circuit]] invalidated a ban on [[conversion therapy]] by liberals in that [[Florida]] city and in Palm Beach County, Florida. |
As of May 2022, an estimated 19 states and dozens of cities impose some restrictions on conversion therapy, while [[Minnesota]] failed to enact legislation pushed in promotion of the [[homosexual agenda]] there.<ref>https://www.twincities.com/2022/05/19/lgbtq-conversion-therapy-ban-fails-to-advance-in-minnesota-senate/</ref> Addition states and cities are constantly considering their own bans, including La Crosse, [[Wisconsin]].<ref>https://lacrossetribune.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/city-council-looks-to-ban-conversion-therapy-in-la-crosse/article_2153c928-ddc8-11ec-9ced-9f4c602f9384.html</ref> | As of May 2022, an estimated 19 states and dozens of cities impose some restrictions on conversion therapy, while [[Minnesota]] failed to enact legislation pushed in promotion of the [[homosexual agenda]] there.<ref>https://www.twincities.com/2022/05/19/lgbtq-conversion-therapy-ban-fails-to-advance-in-minnesota-senate/</ref> Addition states and cities are constantly considering their own bans, including La Crosse, [[Wisconsin]].<ref>https://lacrossetribune.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/city-council-looks-to-ban-conversion-therapy-in-la-crosse/article_2153c928-ddc8-11ec-9ced-9f4c602f9384.html</ref> | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
[[category:censorship]] | [[category:censorship]] | ||
| − | [[category:homosexual | + | [[category:homosexual Agenda]] |
Latest revision as of 02:53, May 30, 2022
Censorship of conversion therapy has been attempted by liberals for more than a decade, and is contrary to reason and freedom of speech.[1] In Otto v. City of Boca Raton, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit invalidated a ban on conversion therapy by liberals in that Florida city and in Palm Beach County, Florida.
As of May 2022, an estimated 19 states and dozens of cities impose some restrictions on conversion therapy, while Minnesota failed to enact legislation pushed in promotion of the homosexual agenda there.[2] Addition states and cities are constantly considering their own bans, including La Crosse, Wisconsin.[3]
References
- ↑ https://reason.com/2016/01/29/conversion-therapy-is-bad-but-banning-it/
- ↑ https://www.twincities.com/2022/05/19/lgbtq-conversion-therapy-ban-fails-to-advance-in-minnesota-senate/
- ↑ https://lacrossetribune.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/city-council-looks-to-ban-conversion-therapy-in-la-crosse/article_2153c928-ddc8-11ec-9ced-9f4c602f9384.html