Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lori Lightfoot"
(Signed my name to my contribution) |
m (Minor edit. Added the word "of" where it was missing.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | I joined as an editor this evening because I'd like to help build a truly unbiased store of knowledge. In this endeavor I believe that one of the most important disciplines of professional journalism, and encyclopedic writing, is for such writing to be free subjective adjectives. For the same reason that I would challenge an article which presented President Donald Trump as the "RACIST 45th President of the United States", I am asking here why Conservapedia would want to have an article on Lori Lightfoot which opens up with "Lori Lightfoot (born August 4, 1962) is the current CORRUPT FASCIST Democrat mayor of Chicago. | + | I joined as an editor this evening because I'd like to help build a truly unbiased store of knowledge. In this endeavor I believe that one of the most important disciplines of professional journalism, and encyclopedic writing, is for such writing to be free of subjective adjectives. For the same reason that I would challenge an article which presented President Donald Trump as the "RACIST 45th President of the United States", I am asking here why Conservapedia would want to have an article on Lori Lightfoot which opens up with "Lori Lightfoot (born August 4, 1962) is the current CORRUPT FASCIST Democrat mayor of Chicago. |
I am a Conservative. In my personal opinion Lori Lightfoot is a terrible mayor. Her ideology and her policies are perfectly aligned with all that is destructive in the Left Wing forces that are wrecking havoc in the United States at this time. This established, I feel that it's a terrible disservice to this new project which I'd love to see thrive as a beacon of good, honest American writing, to have that opening sentence in this article. | I am a Conservative. In my personal opinion Lori Lightfoot is a terrible mayor. Her ideology and her policies are perfectly aligned with all that is destructive in the Left Wing forces that are wrecking havoc in the United States at this time. This established, I feel that it's a terrible disservice to this new project which I'd love to see thrive as a beacon of good, honest American writing, to have that opening sentence in this article. | ||
Revision as of 04:42, May 2, 2022
I joined as an editor this evening because I'd like to help build a truly unbiased store of knowledge. In this endeavor I believe that one of the most important disciplines of professional journalism, and encyclopedic writing, is for such writing to be free of subjective adjectives. For the same reason that I would challenge an article which presented President Donald Trump as the "RACIST 45th President of the United States", I am asking here why Conservapedia would want to have an article on Lori Lightfoot which opens up with "Lori Lightfoot (born August 4, 1962) is the current CORRUPT FASCIST Democrat mayor of Chicago.
I am a Conservative. In my personal opinion Lori Lightfoot is a terrible mayor. Her ideology and her policies are perfectly aligned with all that is destructive in the Left Wing forces that are wrecking havoc in the United States at this time. This established, I feel that it's a terrible disservice to this new project which I'd love to see thrive as a beacon of good, honest American writing, to have that opening sentence in this article.
Let the detailed study of Lori Lightfoot's agenda, actions, and administration inform readers that she is a corrupt fascist. If that is indeed what she is, the honest report of her actions will be conveyed to readers. For Conservapedia to be what I think its founder intends it to be, and what I hope it will be, articles here should not contain the types of unprofessional, emotion-laden adjectives with which left wing writers soil their home.
The opening sentence of the article on Lori Lightfoot should be: Lori Lightfoot (born August 4, 1962) is the current Democrat mayor of Chicago. And that's all. The two removed adjectives (CORRUPT FASCIST) should be mentally inserted by readers as they study the objectively reported facts of her administration.
- SkyGrass (New editor : joined May 1, 2022