Difference between revisions of "Talk:Conservapedia insights"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Two equally valid insights.: new section) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::Hahah never mind, you're right, it does make a good point. Please leave it unchanged.--[[User:ThomasE|ThomasE]] 18:27, 11 May 2008 (EDT) | ::Hahah never mind, you're right, it does make a good point. Please leave it unchanged.--[[User:ThomasE|ThomasE]] 18:27, 11 May 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Two equally valid insights. == | ||
| + | |||
| + | #Conservapedia observed that "[[Son of Man]]" is a [[liberal]] mistranslation to downplay the divinity of [[Jesus]], and that a stronger, more precise translation would be "The Son as Man" or "The Son, a Man." | ||
| + | #Conservapedia observed that [[pi]] contains [[pi]] and every other number, despite [[liberal denial]] of the breadth and power of [[infinity]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | At least both insights are equally valid. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 13:01, July 25, 2021 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 17:01, July 25, 2021
I'm not sure which is funnier - that The Scotsman thought the Harvard student's column was serious or that Conservapedia is shouting at the rooftops about it. Read some of his other columns, like "Harvard Doesn't Hate Parties, They Just Hate Us" and the like, then reread the column's parts that are quoted. Then you can come back here and admit how embarrassed you are.--ThomasE 14:35, 11 May 2008 (EDT)
- The point is made with good humor - as in your second example about the lack of parties at Harvard. Or ... perhaps you think your example is trying to say that Harvard is a party school??? I guess you don't think much of political cartoons either.--Aschlafly 16:08, 11 May 2008 (EDT)
- Umm .... what? --CharlesN 16:22, 11 May 2008 (EDT)
- Hahah never mind, you're right, it does make a good point. Please leave it unchanged.--ThomasE 18:27, 11 May 2008 (EDT)
Two equally valid insights.
- Conservapedia observed that "Son of Man" is a liberal mistranslation to downplay the divinity of Jesus, and that a stronger, more precise translation would be "The Son as Man" or "The Son, a Man."
- Conservapedia observed that pi contains pi and every other number, despite liberal denial of the breadth and power of infinity.
At least both insights are equally valid. --AugustO (talk) 13:01, July 25, 2021 (EDT)