Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hunter Biden"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Derogatory Terms Make the Article Less Convincing: reply to Thunkful2) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:The terms used reinforces the points mentioned. Since I'm not the top expert on this topic, perhaps RobSmith can help provide some extra-extensive input. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code><span style="color:black; background:#FFABAB">'''LT'''</span></code>]]'''''[[User:Liberaltears/mail|<sup>May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!</sup>]]''''' Sunday, 16:23, 1 November 2020 (EST) | :The terms used reinforces the points mentioned. Since I'm not the top expert on this topic, perhaps RobSmith can help provide some extra-extensive input. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code><span style="color:black; background:#FFABAB">'''LT'''</span></code>]]'''''[[User:Liberaltears/mail|<sup>May D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well!</sup>]]''''' Sunday, 16:23, 1 November 2020 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::All these terms to is reinforce that the article is not objective, but derogatory. Such language just demeans the Conservapedia. Another example is saying "kicked out" instead of given a ___ discharge naming the actual category used. ([[User:Thunkful2|Thunkful2]] ([[User talk:Thunkful2|talk]]) 16:25, 1 November 2020 (EST)) | ||
Revision as of 21:25, November 1, 2020
Derogatory Terms Make the Article Less Convincing
I suggest that all derogatory terms like "Princeling"be deleted and objective terms used. Such terms make an objective reader doubt the veracity of the article. You shoot yourself in the foot with stuff like "white-privileged." (Thunkful2 (talk) 16:19, 1 November 2020 (EST))
- The terms used reinforces the points mentioned. Since I'm not the top expert on this topic, perhaps RobSmith can help provide some extra-extensive input. —
LTMay D.C., his mother, and I.S. be all well! Sunday, 16:23, 1 November 2020 (EST)