Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pakistan"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "==Relations with US== In light of the Osama bin Laden situation, and the military strikes throughout the Obama administration and late in the second term of the Bush administrati...")
 
(→‎discuss: new section)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Relations with US==
 
==Relations with US==
 
In light of the Osama bin Laden situation, and the military strikes throughout the Obama administration and late in the second term of the Bush administration, the parts of the article pertaining to the US/Pakistani relationship need to be updated. I added some information on the bin Laden raid, but the article could use a bigger rewrite. [[User:KingHanksley|KingHanksley]] 14:53, 8 May 2011 (EDT)
 
In light of the Osama bin Laden situation, and the military strikes throughout the Obama administration and late in the second term of the Bush administration, the parts of the article pertaining to the US/Pakistani relationship need to be updated. I added some information on the bin Laden raid, but the article could use a bigger rewrite. [[User:KingHanksley|KingHanksley]] 14:53, 8 May 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
== discuss ==
 +
 +
Bytemsu: Could you please discuss why you have chosen to remove and modify verified entries, and replaced them with what could be considered contentious and mostly opinionated statements in your recent editing? - RepublicanRichard.

Revision as of 17:44, May 20, 2020

Relations with US

In light of the Osama bin Laden situation, and the military strikes throughout the Obama administration and late in the second term of the Bush administration, the parts of the article pertaining to the US/Pakistani relationship need to be updated. I added some information on the bin Laden raid, but the article could use a bigger rewrite. KingHanksley 14:53, 8 May 2011 (EDT)

discuss

Bytemsu: Could you please discuss why you have chosen to remove and modify verified entries, and replaced them with what could be considered contentious and mostly opinionated statements in your recent editing? - RepublicanRichard.