Difference between revisions of "Talk:Loving v. Virginia"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Not protected anymore, removed warning)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
{{protect|RobS}}
 
−
 
 
== Edit War ==
 
== Edit War ==
 
How typical.  Scream about a homosexual agenda, but when someone plays the same game and uses "conservative agenda" you get your panties in a bunch.  There is nothing wuie like being the object of someone's suspicion, distrust, and revilement.  [[User:Prof0705|Prof0705]] 17:04, 13 May 2007 (EDT)
 
How typical.  Scream about a homosexual agenda, but when someone plays the same game and uses "conservative agenda" you get your panties in a bunch.  There is nothing wuie like being the object of someone's suspicion, distrust, and revilement.  [[User:Prof0705|Prof0705]] 17:04, 13 May 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 20:24, May 15, 2007

Edit War

How typical. Scream about a homosexual agenda, but when someone plays the same game and uses "conservative agenda" you get your panties in a bunch. There is nothing wuie like being the object of someone's suspicion, distrust, and revilement. Prof0705 17:04, 13 May 2007 (EDT)

Sorry, but in the above comment, you lost me. RobS 17:37, 13 May 2007 (EDT)
Me too. Huh?--Britinme 18:00, 13 May 2007 (EDT)

Unlock Request

So I was wrong about the previous version of this article, but I'd like to improve this article. I'm a law student and I'd like to inject some real law into this article. May I? I've seen the previous source of disagreement on this article & will steer clear of it.-Speaker 14:19, 15 May 2007 (EDT)

Done. You a friend of AmesG? RobS 14:32, 15 May 2007 (EDT)

Fellow law student. Don't know what school he was at, so we might be at the same school. I admired his work from afar before creating my own user ID, but he was a little too... errr... forward, and seemed to make people too angry. I strive not to make people angry :-). Thanks!-Speaker 14:36, 15 May 2007 (EDT)