Difference between revisions of "Talk:Longest liberal denials"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(reversions explained) |
(→Citing: new section) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Let's stick with clear, simple examples. Hence the reversions.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:36, 5 March 2009 (EST) | Let's stick with clear, simple examples. Hence the reversions.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:36, 5 March 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Citing == | ||
| + | |||
| + | This article cites no sources. [[User:Fire$hark|Fire$hark]] ([[User talk:Fire$hark|talk]]) 20:42, 9 February 2020 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 01:42, February 10, 2020
Andy, should we specify "communism in Russia" for Reagan? There are still communist countries around, though I'm not sure if they're considered communist or socialist. Jeffrey W. LauttamusDiscussion 20:14, 5 March 2009 (EST)
- A valid point, but a tad nit-picky? How about "fall of communism," which is not as final as "end". It didn't merely disappear in Russia.--Andy Schlafly 20:24, 5 March 2009 (EST)
- Very nit-picky, though I think that may be a personality flaw. I like the new version. --Jeffrey W. LauttamusDiscussion 20:28, 5 March 2009 (EST)
Reversions
Let's stick with clear, simple examples. Hence the reversions.--Andy Schlafly 20:36, 5 March 2009 (EST)
Citing
This article cites no sources. Fire$hark (talk) 20:42, 9 February 2020 (EST)