Difference between revisions of "Talk:Idea of Progress"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "This is a very good article. It's closely related to the Progressive View of History, the human species improves with time. A confusion of technologicsl development with moral...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
−
This is a very good article. It's closely related to the Progressive View of History, the human species improves with time. A confusion of technologicsl development with moral progress. Of course we have the Tower of Babel, the Titanic, and sSpace Shuttle Challenger (I suppose you could throw the engineering achievement of the World Trade Center in there, too) and other things people put their faith in as examples of the Idea of Progress. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 07:28, 16 December 2018 (EST)
+
This is a very good article. It's closely related to the Progressive View of History, the human species improves with time. A confusion of technologicsl development with moral progress. Of course we have the Tower of Babel, the Titanic, the Space Shuttle Challenger (I suppose you could throw the engineering achievement of the World Trade Center in there, too) and other things people put faith in as examples of the Idea of Progress. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 07:28, 16 December 2018 (EST)

Revision as of 12:29, December 16, 2018

This is a very good article. It's closely related to the Progressive View of History, the human species improves with time. A confusion of technologicsl development with moral progress. Of course we have the Tower of Babel, the Titanic, the Space Shuttle Challenger (I suppose you could throw the engineering achievement of the World Trade Center in there, too) and other things people put faith in as examples of the Idea of Progress. RobSDeep Six the Deep State! 07:28, 16 December 2018 (EST)