Difference between revisions of "Talk:Old Testament"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(Tanakh, not Torah)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
Actually "Old Testament" is much more proper, since the book was fulfilled by the coming of Jesus.
 
Actually "Old Testament" is much more proper, since the book was fulfilled by the coming of Jesus.
 
:...several million Jews would rather disagree on that point, but I digress. The title of the book is "Torah", which roughly translates to "Law"; "Old Testament" is incorrect, unless you also want to refer to "Gospel" as "Good News" (the literal translation of the Greek word).--[[User:M|M]] 12:53, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
 
:...several million Jews would rather disagree on that point, but I digress. The title of the book is "Torah", which roughly translates to "Law"; "Old Testament" is incorrect, unless you also want to refer to "Gospel" as "Good News" (the literal translation of the Greek word).--[[User:M|M]] 12:53, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Not only Torah. Torah+Nevi'im+Ketuvim = [[Tanakh]], the Hebrew Bible, Old Testament. --[[User:Aulis Eskola|Aulis Eskola]] 09:48, 7 May 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 13:48, May 7, 2007

Perhaps this page should be merged with Torah? That is its proper name, after all.

Actually "Old Testament" is much more proper, since the book was fulfilled by the coming of Jesus.

...several million Jews would rather disagree on that point, but I digress. The title of the book is "Torah", which roughly translates to "Law"; "Old Testament" is incorrect, unless you also want to refer to "Gospel" as "Good News" (the literal translation of the Greek word).--M 12:53, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
Not only Torah. Torah+Nevi'im+Ketuvim = Tanakh, the Hebrew Bible, Old Testament. --Aulis Eskola 09:48, 7 May 2007 (EDT)