Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gerontology"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(to Karajou)
(Added talkheader template. Use this for talk pages that exists.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{talkheader}}
 
Pseudoscience? How so?
 
Pseudoscience? How so?
 
:Perhaps you could come up with an interesting article about the subject - perhaps with proof that it is not a pseudoscience - instead of sitting in England somewhere doing nothing more than being a critic.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:40, 28 October 2010 (EDT)
 
:Perhaps you could come up with an interesting article about the subject - perhaps with proof that it is not a pseudoscience - instead of sitting in England somewhere doing nothing more than being a critic.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:40, 28 October 2010 (EDT)
  
 
::There is some pseudoscience in this field, but some of it '''might''' still be real science. Anyway, I rearranged and renamed the article. Cheers! :-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:52, 28 October 2010 (EDT)
 
::There is some pseudoscience in this field, but some of it '''might''' still be real science. Anyway, I rearranged and renamed the article. Cheers! :-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:52, 28 October 2010 (EDT)

Revision as of 16:45, November 8, 2018

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gerontology article.

Article policies

Pseudoscience? How so?

Perhaps you could come up with an interesting article about the subject - perhaps with proof that it is not a pseudoscience - instead of sitting in England somewhere doing nothing more than being a critic. Karajou 14:40, 28 October 2010 (EDT)
There is some pseudoscience in this field, but some of it might still be real science. Anyway, I rearranged and renamed the article. Cheers! :-) --Ed Poor Talk 14:52, 28 October 2010 (EDT)