Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Supremacists Case List"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(User:Joo's edits were excellent, I think. Open to further discussion but overall User:Joo improved the page. Timely, too.)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
User:Joo's edits were excellent, I think.  Open to further discussion but overall User:Joo improved the page.  Timely, too.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 23:50, 20 May 2018 (EDT)
 
User:Joo's edits were excellent, I think.  Open to further discussion but overall User:Joo improved the page.  Timely, too.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 23:50, 20 May 2018 (EDT)
 +
 +
:May I ask why you changed your mind on the Supreme Court cases (considering you originally added all three to the article and now support taking them out)?
 +
 +
:Also, the commentary is off-topic and out of place in the article, considering that this article is a list of cases. There are many other cases in this article that we could add notes to, but it's better to keep them out of this article. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 00:31, 21 May 2018 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 04:31, May 21, 2018

User:Joo's edits were excellent, I think. Open to further discussion but overall User:Joo improved the page. Timely, too.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 23:50, 20 May 2018 (EDT)

May I ask why you changed your mind on the Supreme Court cases (considering you originally added all three to the article and now support taking them out)?
Also, the commentary is off-topic and out of place in the article, considering that this article is a list of cases. There are many other cases in this article that we could add notes to, but it's better to keep them out of this article. --1990'sguy (talk) 00:31, 21 May 2018 (EDT)