Difference between revisions of "Talk:Imperialism"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
 
:One might guess that the article deals with nation-states not the predominate religion of the colonizers, which, yes, just happened to be Christianity.-_-[[User:Rob Pommer| Rob Pommer]]<sub>[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|talk]]</sub> 17:11, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
 
:One might guess that the article deals with nation-states not the predominate religion of the colonizers, which, yes, just happened to be Christianity.-_-[[User:Rob Pommer| Rob Pommer]]<sub>[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|talk]]</sub> 17:11, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
 
:::Ok fine.  Arabic imperialism or Middle eastern imperialism.[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]]
 
:::Ok fine.  Arabic imperialism or Middle eastern imperialism.[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]]
 +
::::One might think Bohdan had something against Islam.  What about cultural imperialism?  Chinese imperialism?  Japanese imperialism?  The imperialism of various central- and south-American ancient cultures and their imperialism?  Zulu imperialism?  Pre-Islamic middle-eastern and central Asian imperialism?--[[User:Olly|Olly]] 17:18, 1 May 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 21:18, May 1, 2007

Why does this article only speak of Europe? This implies that only Europe was imperialistic. Shouldnt it mention islamic imperialism?Bohdan

One might guess that the article deals with nation-states not the predominate religion of the colonizers, which, yes, just happened to be Christianity.-_- Rob Pommertalk 17:11, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
Ok fine. Arabic imperialism or Middle eastern imperialism.Bohdan
One might think Bohdan had something against Islam. What about cultural imperialism? Chinese imperialism? Japanese imperialism? The imperialism of various central- and south-American ancient cultures and their imperialism? Zulu imperialism? Pre-Islamic middle-eastern and central Asian imperialism?--Olly 17:18, 1 May 2007 (EDT)