Difference between revisions of "Sakraida v. AG Pro, Inc."
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) (→top: clean up & uniformity) |
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) (→top: Category) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] | [[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] | ||
| − | [[Category:Patent | + | [[Category:Patent Law]] |
Latest revision as of 16:37, July 28, 2016
In Sakraida v. AG Pro, Inc., 425 U.S. 273 (1976), the U.S. Supreme Court derived from its patent precedents the conclusion that when a patent "simply arranges old elements with each performing the same function it had been known to perform" and yields no more than one would expect from such an arrangement, the combination is obvious. Id. at 282.