Difference between revisions of "Essay:Quantifying Perfection"

Revision as of 20:37, October 4, 2015

Whatever Andrew Schlafly says it is. He's the new pope.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-'''[[Perfection]]''' can be quantified just as height, weight, speech, intelligence, and other attributes are quantified, though perhaps not as easily.  In the [[Epistle to the Hebrews]], the author (possibly [[Jesus]]) emphasized the significance of perfection.  In logical thought it as substantial importance also.  But how should one quantify it?
+Whatever Andrew Schlafly says it is. He's the new pope.
-== Quantifying Perfection in Golf ==
-What would be a "perfect" round of golf?  Currently golf games are quantified with a higher number representing poorer performance.  How could it be quantified such that a "100" represents a perfect round of 18 holes?
-One approach is to say that a perfect round of golf would be a hole-in-one on every hole.  But that is an impossible round of golf, and something unattainable would be a poor definition of perfection.
-== Quantifying Perfection in Football ==
-What would be a perfect game played by a team in football?
-== See also ==
-*[[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness]]