Difference between revisions of "Spreading"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
| − | Spreading is a rhetorical | + | Spreading is a rhetorical strategy used by debators, such as attorneys. The method is to overload the opponent with a mass of information of dubious (or nonexistent) factuality, all of which the opponent must then refute. The goal is to bog the opponent down, especially in a scenario with limited time, to obtain victory by sheer confusion. |
| − | In essence, the tactic is similar to a [[filibuster]], another rhetorical | + | In essence, the tactic is similar to a [[filibuster]], another rhetorical strategy that exploits limited time scenarios. |
[[Category:Law]] | [[Category:Law]] | ||
Revision as of 16:32, April 19, 2007
Spreading is a rhetorical strategy used by debators, such as attorneys. The method is to overload the opponent with a mass of information of dubious (or nonexistent) factuality, all of which the opponent must then refute. The goal is to bog the opponent down, especially in a scenario with limited time, to obtain victory by sheer confusion.
In essence, the tactic is similar to a filibuster, another rhetorical strategy that exploits limited time scenarios.