Difference between revisions of "Roe 1 v. Prince William County"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by AArrsefly (Talk) to last revision by FernoKlump)
(Replaced content with "Inky binky bonky daddy had a donkey donkey died daddy cried inky binky bonky")
Line 1: Line 1:
−
In '''''Roe 1, et al., v. Prince William County''''', 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88405 (E.D. Va. Dec. 3, 2007), Judge James Cacheris upheld Resolutions and Orders passed by Prince William County in Virginia designed to exclude [[illegal aliens]].
+
Inky binky bonky
−
 
+
daddy had a donkey
−
First the County passed resolutions directing the local police to check the immigration status of suspects when detained for a crime, and then the County adopted a resolution to restrict social services to illegal aliens.  It also adopted a resolution that "directs staff to implement processes ... to prevent business licenses from being issued to persons who cannot demonstrate legal presence."
+
donkey died
−
 
+
daddy cried
−
Unnamed [[illegal aliens]] asserted that the County's actions caused them economic loss, fear of separation from their families, and other injuries.  They argued that the County's "Resolutions and Orders" violated the [[Supremacy Clause]] of the [[United States Constitution]] by impermissibly regulating immigration, and the [[Equal Protection Clause]] of the [[Fourteenth Amendment]] by discriminating based on immigration status.
+
inky binky bonky
−
 
 
−
They filed suit in the Eastern District of Virginia, the most pro-federal government venue where hundreds of thousands of federal workers reside.
 
−
 
 
−
[[Reagan]]-appointed Judge James Cacheris upheld the County's actions and dismissing the lawsuit.  "Unlike the ordinance in [[Lozano v. City of Hazleton|Lozano]], the Resolutions and Orders have no effect on the leasing of property, nor do they have any immediate impact on business regulation." 
 
−
 
 
−
Judge Cacheris ruled that the illegal aliens and their organization lacked standing to challenge the County's rules, because the aliens had not suffered any real injury.  He found that the County did not criminalize any conduct that was not already a crime.  "Neither the Resolution nor the Orders direct the actions of private citizens or criminalize behavior that was not already punishable by local, state, or federal ordinance, and thus fear of such punishment does not create a cognizable injury."
 
−
 
 
−
[[category:immigration]]
 
−
[[category:District Court Cases]]
 

Revision as of 00:25, February 27, 2015

Inky binky bonky daddy had a donkey donkey died daddy cried inky binky bonky

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Roe_1_v._Prince_William_County&oldid=1142482"