Difference between revisions of "Talk:Non-Euclidean geometry"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: ''In Euclidean geometry because parallel lines go on to infinity and never intersect the sum of angles in triangles is always greater than 180 degrees,'' This doesn't appear to be correct...)
 
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
This doesn't appear to be correct.  Is there a word missing?  I thought in Euclidean geometry the sum of the angles in triangles is always exactly 180 degrees [[User:Chrysogonus|Chrysogonus]] 15:46, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
 
This doesn't appear to be correct.  Is there a word missing?  I thought in Euclidean geometry the sum of the angles in triangles is always exactly 180 degrees [[User:Chrysogonus|Chrysogonus]] 15:46, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
Correct. Obviously been missed by several editors.--[[User:CatWatcher|CatWatcher]] 16:10, 17 April 2007 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 20:10, April 17, 2007

In Euclidean geometry because parallel lines go on to infinity and never intersect the sum of angles in triangles is always greater than 180 degrees,

This doesn't appear to be correct. Is there a word missing? I thought in Euclidean geometry the sum of the angles in triangles is always exactly 180 degrees Chrysogonus 15:46, 17 April 2007 (EDT)

Correct. Obviously been missed by several editors.--CatWatcher 16:10, 17 April 2007 (EDT)