Difference between revisions of "Talk:Romanization"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Dikaiosune (talk | contribs) (New page: ==Pinyin vs Wade-Giles== There needs to be discussion in all articles relating to China whether to use Pinyin or Wade-Giles. I have fixed the factual error in this article that promoted ...) |
Blackjuice (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
==Pinyin vs Wade-Giles== | ==Pinyin vs Wade-Giles== | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
[[User:Dikaiosune|Dikaiosune]] 20 March 2007 | [[User:Dikaiosune|Dikaiosune]] 20 March 2007 | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Wade-Giles is considered inaccurate by many scholars, and it should also be noted that the Republic of China no longer uses Wade-Giles, but instead a system known as Tongyong Pinyin. This system is very similar to hanyu pinyin and is taught in exactly the same way. | ||
Revision as of 19:41, April 16, 2007
Pinyin vs Wade-Giles
There needs to be discussion in all articles relating to China whether to use Pinyin or Wade-Giles. I have fixed the factual error in this article that promoted Wade-Giles, namely because Pinyin has been accepted and has superseded Wade-Giles in the United States.
Dikaiosune 20 March 2007
- Wade-Giles is considered inaccurate by many scholars, and it should also be noted that the Republic of China no longer uses Wade-Giles, but instead a system known as Tongyong Pinyin. This system is very similar to hanyu pinyin and is taught in exactly the same way.