Difference between revisions of "Evolution is a religion"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
In the leading American science science journal ''Science'', Michael Ruse published an article in 2003 entitled ''Is Evolution a Secular Religion?''<ref>[http://www.sciencemag.org/content/299/5612/1523.full Is Evolution a Secular Religion?] by Dr. [[Michael Ruse]], ''Science'',  March 7, 2003</ref>
 
In the leading American science science journal ''Science'', Michael Ruse published an article in 2003 entitled ''Is Evolution a Secular Religion?''<ref>[http://www.sciencemag.org/content/299/5612/1523.full Is Evolution a Secular Religion?] by Dr. [[Michael Ruse]], ''Science'',  March 7, 2003</ref>
 +
 +
== See also ==
 +
 +
*[[Evolution as a secular origins myth]]
 +
*[[Atheism is a religion]]
  
 
== External links ==
 
== External links ==

Revision as of 12:26, March 16, 2014

Michael Ruse, the atheist and evolutionist philosopher of science said, “Evolution is promoted by its practitioners as more than mere science. Evolution is promulgated as an ideology, a secular religion -- a full-fledged alternative to Christianity, with meaning and morality. I am an ardent evolutionist and an ex-Christian, but I must admit that in this one complaint -- and Mr. Gish is but one of many to make it -- the literalists are absolutely right. Evolution is a religion. This was true of evolution in the beginning, and it is true of evolution still today.”[1]

In the leading American science science journal Science, Michael Ruse published an article in 2003 entitled Is Evolution a Secular Religion?[2]

See also

External links

Michael Ruse:

References

Pseudoscience