Difference between revisions of "Talk:Peyton Manning"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by WilburS (talk) to last revision by Eg)
(The assertion is well-supported. The liberal media hype about Peyton Manning could hardly be greater, and yet he repeatedly underachieves when it counts as in latest season.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I'm sorry, is this an encyclopedia or an editorial page? The claim that Manning is "overrated" is completely unsupported, as are all the other opinions stated in the article as is.---eg
 
I'm sorry, is this an encyclopedia or an editorial page? The claim that Manning is "overrated" is completely unsupported, as are all the other opinions stated in the article as is.---eg
 +
 +
:The assertion is well-supported.  The [[liberal media]] hype about Peyton Manning could hardly be greater, and yet he repeatedly underachieves when it counts as in latest season.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:27, 31 May 2013 (EDT)

Revision as of 16:27, May 31, 2013

I'm sorry, is this an encyclopedia or an editorial page? The claim that Manning is "overrated" is completely unsupported, as are all the other opinions stated in the article as is.---eg

The assertion is well-supported. The liberal media hype about Peyton Manning could hardly be greater, and yet he repeatedly underachieves when it counts as in latest season.--Andy Schlafly 12:27, 31 May 2013 (EDT)