Difference between revisions of "User talk:JJCC"
(→edits to the Universe page: do not pretend you represent CP sysops, or that you are the arbitrator of viewpoints here. That is ASchlafly's job) |
|||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
:I see what you mean, but at Conservapedia it is a generally accepted idea that the earth is 6000 years old. I would discuss this further on it's talk page before continuing; some other Conservatives may have something to say about this. And btw: you can sign your talk posts with four tildes (~). [[User:JJCC|JJCC]] 16:58, 27 November 2012 (EST) | :I see what you mean, but at Conservapedia it is a generally accepted idea that the earth is 6000 years old. I would discuss this further on it's talk page before continuing; some other Conservatives may have something to say about this. And btw: you can sign your talk posts with four tildes (~). [[User:JJCC|JJCC]] 16:58, 27 November 2012 (EST) | ||
::It is not, do not pretend it is. JJCC, I am suspecting you are trolling, ''this stops now''. I can, and will make a block if this parody/trolling does not stop.[[User:Brenden|brenden]] 17:26, 27 November 2012 (EST) | ::It is not, do not pretend it is. JJCC, I am suspecting you are trolling, ''this stops now''. I can, and will make a block if this parody/trolling does not stop.[[User:Brenden|brenden]] 17:26, 27 November 2012 (EST) | ||
| + | :::I am not trolling, but most pages here reference 6000 years old. That's all. [[User:JJCC|JJCC]] 07:54, 28 November 2012 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 12:54, November 28, 2012
My talk page. Remember to sign your messages with four tildes (~). I will not respond to spam, vandalism or idiots :-).
"The Soviet Union was arguably not a combatant..."
I would love to see how you would argue that the USSR was not a combatant in the war. MattyD 20:02, 26 November 2012 (EST)
- Not in a greater WWII. Notice I removed it from the Axis side only. The Soviet Union did invade Poland -- but NEVER joined the Axis, and therefore is not part of the Axis in the left column of the infobox. JJCC 20:04, 26 November 2012 (EST)
Hydromorphone
You are free to research, and create articles, but please do not copy WP's articles over. It is not merely a copyright violation (Violates their licence), but is also ethically frowned upon. brenden 20:10, 26 November 2012 (EST)
- Sorry that is being used as a placeholder, I am currently working on an article right now but a completely blank page would seem impractical, no? JJCC 20:11, 26 November 2012 (EST)
edits to the Universe page
Greetings! I just wanted to clarify, I mean no disrespect. I am not denying the 6000 year creation. It's just that not all conservatives accept this model. And there may be another reason why the distant stars are visible; the in situ model is just one of many possibilities.
KatieKomori 17:04, 27 November 2012 (EST)
- I see what you mean, but at Conservapedia it is a generally accepted idea that the earth is 6000 years old. I would discuss this further on it's talk page before continuing; some other Conservatives may have something to say about this. And btw: you can sign your talk posts with four tildes (~). JJCC 16:58, 27 November 2012 (EST)
- It is not, do not pretend it is. JJCC, I am suspecting you are trolling, this stops now. I can, and will make a block if this parody/trolling does not stop.brenden 17:26, 27 November 2012 (EST)
- I am not trolling, but most pages here reference 6000 years old. That's all. JJCC 07:54, 28 November 2012 (EST)
- It is not, do not pretend it is. JJCC, I am suspecting you are trolling, this stops now. I can, and will make a block if this parody/trolling does not stop.brenden 17:26, 27 November 2012 (EST)