Difference between revisions of "Perfect-solution fallacy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Examples: link) |
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*Because [[abstinence]]-only education does not completely eliminate teen pregnancy, abstinence should not even be mentioned in schools. (See [[abstinence denial]]) | *Because [[abstinence]]-only education does not completely eliminate teen pregnancy, abstinence should not even be mentioned in schools. (See [[abstinence denial]]) | ||
*Because sodomy laws did not completely eliminate [[HIV]], there was no point in enforcing them. | *Because sodomy laws did not completely eliminate [[HIV]], there was no point in enforcing them. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == See also == | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[[Perfectionism]] | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
[[Category:Logical Fallacies]] | [[Category:Logical Fallacies]] | ||
Latest revision as of 21:18, February 15, 2024
The perfect-solution fallacy, also called letting the perfect be the enemy of the good, is the logical fallacy of assuming that just because a solution does not perfectly solve a problem, it is not worth trying at all.[1] It is a particular form of a false dilemma. The perfect-solution fallacy is similar but not identical to the Nirvana fallacy.
Examples
Liberals often commit the perfect-solution fallacy, as in the following examples:
- Because abstinence-only education does not completely eliminate teen pregnancy, abstinence should not even be mentioned in schools. (See abstinence denial)
- Because sodomy laws did not completely eliminate HIV, there was no point in enforcing them.