Difference between revisions of "Stephen Danforth v. Minnesota"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by Cataract (talk) to last revision by NathanG)
m (Link)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
This case presents a question to the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] concerning [[criminal law]]:<ref> U.S. Supreme Court. Danforth v. Minnesota, No. 06-8273. Certiorari granted May 23, 2007. Ruling below: 718 N.W.2d 451 (Minn. 2006).</ref>
 
This case presents a question to the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] concerning [[criminal law]]:<ref> U.S. Supreme Court. Danforth v. Minnesota, No. 06-8273. Certiorari granted May 23, 2007. Ruling below: 718 N.W.2d 451 (Minn. 2006).</ref>
  
−
*Are state supreme courts required to use the standard announced in Teague v. Lane to determine whether U.S. Supreme Court decisions apply retroactively to state-court criminal cases?  
+
*Are state supreme courts required to use the standard announced in [[Teague v. Lane]] to determine whether U.S. Supreme Court decisions apply retroactively to state-court criminal cases?  
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==

Revision as of 03:42, August 1, 2015

This case presents a question to the U.S. Supreme Court concerning criminal law:[1]

  • Are state supreme courts required to use the standard announced in Teague v. Lane to determine whether U.S. Supreme Court decisions apply retroactively to state-court criminal cases?

References

  1. ↑ U.S. Supreme Court. Danforth v. Minnesota, No. 06-8273. Certiorari granted May 23, 2007. Ruling below: 718 N.W.2d 451 (Minn. 2006).