Difference between revisions of "Harry Potter Witchcraft Repackaged"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (cats) |
RayFlagherty (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Harry Potter: Witchcraft Repackaged is an enlightening documentary on the [[Harry Potter]] series by J.K. Rowling, which has the main characters use Bible-forbidden magic. It was published in 2002 and is narrated by Caryl Matrisciana. | + | Harry Potter: Witchcraft Repackaged is an enlightening documentary on the [[Harry Potter]] series by [[Christian]] author J.K. Rowling, which has the main characters use Bible-forbidden magic. It was published in 2002 and is narrated by Caryl Matrisciana. |
| − | It touches on issues such as the satanic rituals, occult symbols, and other | + | It touches on issues such as the satanic rituals, occult symbols, and other heresies which don't actually appear in the novels. It also raises the controversy of how these books have infiltrated public schools and libraries. It was created solely to expose the Harry Potter series as a recruitment tool for various cults, such as a large number of Harry Potter fan clubs. |
This documentary has been heavily criticized by the [[liberal media]], calling it "crazy" and "insane". | This documentary has been heavily criticized by the [[liberal media]], calling it "crazy" and "insane". | ||
Revision as of 13:45, February 23, 2012
Harry Potter: Witchcraft Repackaged is an enlightening documentary on the Harry Potter series by Christian author J.K. Rowling, which has the main characters use Bible-forbidden magic. It was published in 2002 and is narrated by Caryl Matrisciana.
It touches on issues such as the satanic rituals, occult symbols, and other heresies which don't actually appear in the novels. It also raises the controversy of how these books have infiltrated public schools and libraries. It was created solely to expose the Harry Potter series as a recruitment tool for various cults, such as a large number of Harry Potter fan clubs.
This documentary has been heavily criticized by the liberal media, calling it "crazy" and "insane".