Difference between revisions of "Godwin's law"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
| − | In modern usage, it applies to all arguments, not just on the [[internet]], and according to Godwin's law the first side to reference the [[Nazis]] is generally assumed to have lost the argument | + | In modern usage, it applies to all arguments, not just on the [[internet]], and according to Godwin's law the first side to reference the [[Nazis]] is generally assumed to have lost the argument, unless the conversation topic is about [[Nazis]]. |
Liberals become enraged if accused of invoking Godwin's Law and often confuse it with [[Reductio ad Hitlerum]]. | Liberals become enraged if accused of invoking Godwin's Law and often confuse it with [[Reductio ad Hitlerum]]. | ||
Revision as of 02:24, December 9, 2011
Godwin's Law is a law of Usenet named after Mike Godwin concerning Usenet "discussions".
As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one.
In modern usage, it applies to all arguments, not just on the internet, and according to Godwin's law the first side to reference the Nazis is generally assumed to have lost the argument, unless the conversation topic is about Nazis.
Liberals become enraged if accused of invoking Godwin's Law and often confuse it with Reductio ad Hitlerum.
Other Laws of Internet Arguments:
Further Reading
- How to post about Nazis and get away with it - the Godwin's Law FAQ
- George Soros Compares President Bush to Nazis