Difference between revisions of "Talk:Essay: Darwin fish meet the Question evolution! campaign"
AlejandroH (talk | contribs) |
Conservative (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
The Question Evolution! Campaign is a shark mindlessly chasing its own tail? [[DGalore]] | The Question Evolution! Campaign is a shark mindlessly chasing its own tail? [[DGalore]] | ||
:You obviously did not understand it. The shark is Darwin fish, not question evolution campaign.--[[User:AlejandroH|AlejandroH]] 23:35, 5 December 2011 (EST) | :You obviously did not understand it. The shark is Darwin fish, not question evolution campaign.--[[User:AlejandroH|AlejandroH]] 23:35, 5 December 2011 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Question evolution group has gone from 1 to about 15 people in a short time and the pace of it gaining new members appears to be going faster and faster as can be seen [http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2011/12/our-growing-question-evolution-campaign.html HERE]. Meanwhile, [[Global atheism]] continues to shrink. Face it. Your ideology is turning into a guppy while the Question evolution campaign is turning into [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nb8t3Lt8iJw&feature=related Jaws.] Face it, in the open public forum (unprotected by the liberal media, liberal politicians, liberal academia and liberal evolutionist judges), evolutionists are going to be facing [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWBRpZhk_vA open water] conditions. The 15 razor sharp teeth of the [[Question evolution! campaign]], are going to publicly rip your evolutionary pseudoscience to shreds. 01:49, 6 December 2011 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 06:49, December 6, 2011
This animation is really really bad. Can't you find a better one? MaxFletcher 15:13, 30 November 2011 (EST)
- Don't worry, it appears given the expanding volunteer base of a certain group, soon there will be animations/essays using piranha or schools of sharks. :) Conservative 15:23, 30 November 2011 (EST)
- OK, but in the meantime this animation is terrible. It looks bad and moves even worse. Not a good image. MaxFletcher 15:29, 30 November 2011 (EST)
- Why don't you ask Shockofgod if he likes it. :) Conservative 15:32, 30 November 2011 (EST)
- is it physically painful for you to respond like a normal human being? The animation is embarrassing and very amateur which makes your campaign look the same. Do you know anything about marketing? MaxFletcher 15:34, 30 November 2011 (EST)
- Max, the evolutionist goal is poorly defended in the biology class stadiums and this is yet another case where biblical Christians are going to slam goal after goal in the atheist/naturalism net. It is going to be glorious! Conservative 15:44, 30 November 2011 (EST)
- That's great. Now about this animation - it looks terribly amateur, is there another one you could use that looks more professional? MaxFletcher 15:50, 30 November 2011 (EST)
- Max, the evolutionist goal is poorly defended in the biology class stadiums and this is yet another case where biblical Christians are going to slam goal after goal in the atheist/naturalism net. It is going to be glorious! Conservative 15:44, 30 November 2011 (EST)
- is it physically painful for you to respond like a normal human being? The animation is embarrassing and very amateur which makes your campaign look the same. Do you know anything about marketing? MaxFletcher 15:34, 30 November 2011 (EST)
- Why don't you ask Shockofgod if he likes it. :) Conservative 15:32, 30 November 2011 (EST)
- OK, but in the meantime this animation is terrible. It looks bad and moves even worse. Not a good image. MaxFletcher 15:29, 30 November 2011 (EST)
- Don't worry, it appears given the expanding volunteer base of a certain group, soon there will be animations/essays using piranha or schools of sharks. :) Conservative 15:23, 30 November 2011 (EST)
In 2011, the results of a study was published indicating that most United States high school biology teachers are reluctant to endorse the theory of evolution in class. Just imagine how timid teachers will be when students are armed with the 15 questions plus any follow up questions that are developed!
"To be certain to take what you attack, attack where the enemy cannot defend." - Sun Tzu Conservative 15:57, 30 November 2011 (EST)
- So this is the best animation you have? You know, if this campaign is to work you need to have a certain amount of polish to it. It needs to be professional, slick and credible. The animation is none of this and, actually, looks stupid. So what image to you want to portray - one of professionalism or one that is amateur? MaxFletcher 16:00, 30 November 2011 (EST)
- Max, if it is such a pressing concern for you, develop a better animation and I may consider using it. I am moving on. Conservative 16:03, 30 November 2011 (EST)
- @ Conservative: The present animation is indeed not that well made. I don't know it is just my browser, but the animation gives a recurring black screen for me. I actually don't care that much but since this article is featured on MPL there will be a lot of people coming to this article and might be disappointed and/or confused by the animation. Maybe you could use an animation from THIS site? À Dieu--VPropp 10:24, 5 December 2011 (EST)
- It's not your browser; I'm getting exactly the same effect. I agree that he should change it, because right now it looks sloppy. One of the animations you suggested would do fine. --ClearView2011 13:46, 5 December 2011 (EST)
- @ Conservative: The present animation is indeed not that well made. I don't know it is just my browser, but the animation gives a recurring black screen for me. I actually don't care that much but since this article is featured on MPL there will be a lot of people coming to this article and might be disappointed and/or confused by the animation. Maybe you could use an animation from THIS site? À Dieu--VPropp 10:24, 5 December 2011 (EST)
- Max, if it is such a pressing concern for you, develop a better animation and I may consider using it. I am moving on. Conservative 16:03, 30 November 2011 (EST)
- So this is the best animation you have? You know, if this campaign is to work you need to have a certain amount of polish to it. It needs to be professional, slick and credible. The animation is none of this and, actually, looks stupid. So what image to you want to portray - one of professionalism or one that is amateur? MaxFletcher 16:00, 30 November 2011 (EST)
The Question Evolution! Campaign is a shark mindlessly chasing its own tail? DGalore
- You obviously did not understand it. The shark is Darwin fish, not question evolution campaign.--AlejandroH 23:35, 5 December 2011 (EST)
A Question evolution group has gone from 1 to about 15 people in a short time and the pace of it gaining new members appears to be going faster and faster as can be seen HERE. Meanwhile, Global atheism continues to shrink. Face it. Your ideology is turning into a guppy while the Question evolution campaign is turning into Jaws. Face it, in the open public forum (unprotected by the liberal media, liberal politicians, liberal academia and liberal evolutionist judges), evolutionists are going to be facing open water conditions. The 15 razor sharp teeth of the Question evolution! campaign, are going to publicly rip your evolutionary pseudoscience to shreds. 01:49, 6 December 2011 (EST)